Cited by 11Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFlooding and Environmental ImpactEthics in Business and Education

Computing ethicsComputer experts: guns-for-hire or professionals?

Johnson, Deborah G.·2008·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

Considering the responsibilities of those who build systems fundamental to significant social functions, institutions, and values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1400181.1400190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, D. G.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Deborah G.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
2008-10
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
24-26
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2029108901
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Flooding and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
computer ethics, professional responsibility, IT professionals, social impact of computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review