Cited by 226Interactive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface DesignTactile and Sensory Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The performance of touch screen soft buttons

Lee, Seungyon, Zhai, Shumin·2009·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

The introduction of a new generation of attractive touch screen-based devices raises many basic usability questions whose answers may influence future design and market direction. With a set of current mobile devices, we conducted three experiments focusing on one of the most basic interaction actions on touch screens: the operation of soft buttons. Issues investigated in this set of experiments include: a comparison of soft button and hard button performance; the impact of audio and vibrato-tactile feedback; the impact of different types of touch sensors on use, behavior, and performance; a quantitative comparison of finger and stylus operation; and an assessment of the impact of soft button sizes below the traditional 22 mm recommendation as well as below finger width.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1518701.1518750

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1145/642611.642631 · DOI
  2. Barrett J. and Krueger H. Performance effects of reduced proprioceptive feedback on touch typists and casual users in a typing task. Behavior&Information technology 13 (1994). 373--381. Barrett J. and Krueger H. Performance effects of reduced proprioceptive feedback on touch typists and casual users in a typing task. Behavior&Information technology 13 (1994). 373--381. · DOI
  3. Buxton W. Chapter 5 Case Study 1:Touch Tablets. in W.Buxton (ed). Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories Techniques and Technology. Unfinished book manuscript. http://www.billbuxton.com/input05.TouchTablets.pdf (in progress accessed Sept 2007). Buxton W. Chapter 5 Case Study 1:Touch Tablets. in W.Buxton (ed). Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories Techniques and Technology. Unfinished book manuscript. http://www.billbuxton.com/input05.TouchTablets.pdf (in progress accessed Sept 2007).
  4. 10.1145/988584.988586 · DOI
  5. 10.1145/325334.325239 · DOI
  6. 10.1145/97243.97263 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/223904.223964 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Greenstein , J.S. Pointing Devices . in M. Helander, T.L., P. Prabhu (ed). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland , Amsterdam . ( 1997 ), 1317--1348. Greenstein, J.S. Pointing Devices. in M. Helander, T.L., P. Prabhu (ed). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, Amsterdam. (1997), 1317--1348.
  9. HenryDreyfusAssociates The Measure of Man and Woman. Whitney Library of Design , New York, NY , 1993 . (1993). HenryDreyfusAssociates The Measure of Man and Woman. Whitney Library of Design, New York, NY, 1993. (1993).
  10. 10.1080/00222895.1991.9941589 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1029632.1029640 · DOI
  12. Lewis , J.R. Literature Review of Touch-Screen Research from1980 to 1992 , IBM , Boca Raton, FL (1993). Lewis, J.R. Literature Review of Touch-Screen Research from1980 to 1992, IBM, Boca Raton, FL (1993).
  13. Lewis , J.R. , Potosnak , K.M. and Magyar , R.L . Keys and Keyboards . in Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (ed). Handbook of human-computer interaction , Elsevier Science , Amsterdam ( 1997 ), 1285--1315. Lewis, J.R., Potosnak, K.M. and Magyar, R.L. Keys and Keyboards. in Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (ed). Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997), 1285--1315.
  14. 10.1145/57167.57171 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/964696.964721 · DOI
  16. Sears , A. Improving touchscreen keyboards: Design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interacting with Computers , 3 , ( 1991 ). 253--269. Sears, A. Improving touchscreen keyboards: Design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interacting with Computers, 3, (1991). 253--269.
  17. Sears , A. , Revis , D. , Swatski , J. , Crittenden , R. and Shneiderman , B. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour& Information Technology , 2 , 1 ( 1993 ). 17--22. Sears, A., Revis, D., Swatski, J., Crittenden, R. and Shneiderman, B. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour&Information Technology, 2, 1 (1993). 17--22.
  18. 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90037-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001 · DOI
  20. Soukoreff , W. and MacKenzie , I.S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard,. Behaviour & Information Technology , 14 , ( 1995 ). 379--379. Soukoreff, W. and MacKenzie, I.S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard,. Behaviour&Information Technology, 14, (1995). 379--379.
  21. 10.1145/1057237.1057242 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.006 · DOI
  23. 10.1145/307710.307728 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1207/S15327051HCI172&3_4 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.007 · DOI
  26. 10.1145/642611.642630 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S., & Zhai, S.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
  • IBM Research - Almaden (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2009-04-04
Pages
309-318
OpenAlex
W2119429908
Cited by
226
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 33
FWCI
15.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
touch screen, mobile devices, usability, audio feedback, haptic feedback, tactile sensors, stylus input, button size, interaction performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review