The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The performance of touch screen soft buttons
Abstract
The introduction of a new generation of attractive touch screen-based devices raises many basic usability questions whose answers may influence future design and market direction. With a set of current mobile devices, we conducted three experiments focusing on one of the most basic interaction actions on touch screens: the operation of soft buttons. Issues investigated in this set of experiments include: a comparison of soft button and hard button performance; the impact of audio and vibrato-tactile feedback; the impact of different types of touch sensors on use, behavior, and performance; a quantitative comparison of finger and stylus operation; and an assessment of the impact of soft button sizes below the traditional 22 mm recommendation as well as below finger width.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258715 · Cited by 3,853 · cited 1×
“TUI offers a compelling alternative to graphical user interfaces (GUI), due to its physical and “graspable” interface representation [7, 11, 24].”
BackgroundRelaxing stylus typing precision by geometric pattern matching
Kristensson, P.-O., & Zhai, S. (2005) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces · doi:10.1145/1040830.1040867 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- 10.1145/642611.642631 · DOI
- Barrett J. and Krueger H. Performance effects of reduced proprioceptive feedback on touch typists and casual users in a typing task. Behavior&Information technology 13 (1994). 373--381. Barrett J. and Krueger H. Performance effects of reduced proprioceptive feedback on touch typists and casual users in a typing task. Behavior&Information technology 13 (1994). 373--381. · DOI
- Buxton W. Chapter 5 Case Study 1:Touch Tablets. in W.Buxton (ed). Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories Techniques and Technology. Unfinished book manuscript. http://www.billbuxton.com/input05.TouchTablets.pdf (in progress accessed Sept 2007). Buxton W. Chapter 5 Case Study 1:Touch Tablets. in W.Buxton (ed). Human Input to Computer Systems: Theories Techniques and Technology. Unfinished book manuscript. http://www.billbuxton.com/input05.TouchTablets.pdf (in progress accessed Sept 2007).
- 10.1145/988584.988586 · DOI
- 10.1145/325334.325239 · DOI
- 10.1145/97243.97263 · DOI
- 10.1145/223904.223964 · DOI · Paper page
- Greenstein , J.S. Pointing Devices . in M. Helander, T.L., P. Prabhu (ed). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland , Amsterdam . ( 1997 ), 1317--1348. Greenstein, J.S. Pointing Devices. in M. Helander, T.L., P. Prabhu (ed). Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, North-Holland, Amsterdam. (1997), 1317--1348.
- HenryDreyfusAssociates The Measure of Man and Woman. Whitney Library of Design , New York, NY , 1993 . (1993). HenryDreyfusAssociates The Measure of Man and Woman. Whitney Library of Design, New York, NY, 1993. (1993).
- 10.1080/00222895.1991.9941589 · DOI
- 10.1145/1029632.1029640 · DOI
- Lewis , J.R. Literature Review of Touch-Screen Research from1980 to 1992 , IBM , Boca Raton, FL (1993). Lewis, J.R. Literature Review of Touch-Screen Research from1980 to 1992, IBM, Boca Raton, FL (1993).
- Lewis , J.R. , Potosnak , K.M. and Magyar , R.L . Keys and Keyboards . in Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (ed). Handbook of human-computer interaction , Elsevier Science , Amsterdam ( 1997 ), 1285--1315. Lewis, J.R., Potosnak, K.M. and Magyar, R.L. Keys and Keyboards. in Helander, M.G., Landauer, T.K. and Prabhu, P.V. (ed). Handbook of human-computer interaction, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1997), 1285--1315.
- 10.1145/57167.57171 · DOI
- 10.1145/964696.964721 · DOI
- Sears , A. Improving touchscreen keyboards: Design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interacting with Computers , 3 , ( 1991 ). 253--269. Sears, A. Improving touchscreen keyboards: Design issues and a comparison with other devices. Interacting with Computers, 3, (1991). 253--269.
- Sears , A. , Revis , D. , Swatski , J. , Crittenden , R. and Shneiderman , B. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour& Information Technology , 2 , 1 ( 1993 ). 17--22. Sears, A., Revis, D., Swatski, J., Crittenden, R. and Shneiderman, B. Investigating touchscreen typing: the effect of keyboard size on typing speed. Behaviour&Information Technology, 2, 1 (1993). 17--22.
- 10.1016/0020-7373(91)90037-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.001 · DOI
- Soukoreff , W. and MacKenzie , I.S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard,. Behaviour & Information Technology , 14 , ( 1995 ). 379--379. Soukoreff, W. and MacKenzie, I.S. Theoretical upper and lower bounds on typing speeds using a stylus and keyboard,. Behaviour&Information Technology, 14, (1995). 379--379.
- 10.1145/1057237.1057242 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.006 · DOI
- 10.1145/307710.307728 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/S15327051HCI172&3_4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.007 · DOI
- 10.1145/642611.642630 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Usability Studies on Mobile User Interface Design Patterns: A Systematic Literature Review
Punchoojit, L., & Hongwarittorrn, N. (2017) · Advances in Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1155/2017/6787504 · Cited by 235
The influence of age in usability testing
Sonderegger, A., Schmutz, S., & Sauer, J. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.012 · Cited by 152
Dunlop, M., & Levine, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208659 · Cited by 99
Towards accessible touch interfaces
Guerreiro, T., Nicolau, H., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2010) · Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1878803.1878809 · Cited by 66
Designing for individuals: usable touch-screen interaction through shared user models
Montague, K., Hanson, V. L., & Cobley, A. (2012) · Proceedings of the 14th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/2384916.2384943 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, S., & Zhai, S.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- IBM Research - Almaden (US)
- ORCID
- Zhai, Shumin
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-04-04
- Pages
- 309-318
- OpenAlex
- W2119429908
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 15.35
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- touch screen, mobile devices, usability, audio feedback, haptic feedback, tactile sensors, stylus input, button size, interaction performance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review