The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation
Abstract
This paper describes a benchmark for evaluation of 3D mesh segmentation salgorithms. The benchmark comprises a data set with 4,300 manually generated segmentations for 380 surface meshes of 19 different object categories, and it includes software for analyzing 11 geometric properties of segmentations and producing 4 quantitative metrics for comparison of segmentations. The paper investigates the design decisions made in building the benchmark, analyzes properties of human-generated and computer-generated segmentations, and provides quantitative comparisons of 7 recently published mesh segmentation algorithms. Our results suggest that people are remarkably consistent in the way that they segment most 3D surface meshes, that no one automatic segmentation algorithm is better than the others for all types of objects, and that algorithms based on non-local shape features seem to produce segmentations that most closely resemble ones made by humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., & Malik, J. (2002) · Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001 · doi:10.1109/iccv.2001.937655 · Cited by 8,216
Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods
Rand, W. M. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482356 · Cited by 6,566
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Shilane, P., Min, P., Kazhdan, M., & Funkhouser, T. (2004) · Proceedings Shape Modeling Applications, 2004. · doi:10.1109/smi.2004.1314504 · Cited by 1,419
Self-citationHoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90022-2 · Cited by 1,342
A survey on evaluation methods for image segmentation
Zhang, Y. J. (1996) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00169-7 · Cited by 1,059
Image segmentation evaluation: A survey of unsupervised methods
Zhang, H., Fritts, J. E., & Goldman, S. A. (2008) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2007.08.003 · Cited by 963
Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation
Lévy, B., Petitjean, S., Ray, N., & Maillot, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques · doi:10.1145/566570.566590 · Cited by 943
Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation
Lévy, B., Petitjean, S., Ray, N., & Maillot, J. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/566654.566590 · Cited by 699
Cited by
ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repository
Chang, A. X., Funkhouser, T. A., Guibas, L. J., Hanrahan, P., Huang, Q., Li, Z., Savarese, S., Savva, M., Song, S., Su, H., et al. (2023) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10089705 · Cited by 1,623
Self-citationA scalable active framework for region annotation in 3D shape collections
Yi, L., Kim, V. G., Ceylan, D., Shen, I.-C., Yan, M., Su, H., Lu, C., Huang, Q., Sheffer, A., & Guibas, L. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2980179.2980238 · Cited by 1,231
A Review on Deep Learning Techniques Applied to Semantic Segmentation
García-García, A., Orts‐Escolano, S., Oprea, S., Villena-Martínez, V., & García‐Rodríguez, J. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1704.06857 · Cited by 991
Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid
Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., & Rosin, P. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.310 · Cited by 679
A Survey on Shape Correspondence
van Kaick, O., Zhang, H., Hamarneh, G., & Cohen‐Or, D. (2011) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01884.x · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, X., Golovinskiy, A., & Funkhouser, T.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2009-07-27
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2050204708
- Cited by
- 654
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 43.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1531326.1531379
- The paper
- Chen, X., Golovinskiy, A., & Funkhouser, T. (2009). A benchmark for 3D mesh segmentation. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/1531326.1531379
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
