The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the effectiveness of secret key extraction from wireless signal strength in real environments
Abstract
We evaluate the effectiveness of secret key extraction, for private communication between two wireless devices, from the received signal strength (RSS) variations on the wireless channel between the two devices. We use real world measurements of RSS in a variety of environments and settings. Our experimental results show that (i) in certain environments, due to lack of variations in the wireless channel, the extracted bits have very low entropy making these bits unsuitable for a secret key, (ii) an adversary can cause predictable key generation in these static environments, and (iii) in dynamic scenarios where the two devices are mobile, and/or where there is a significant movement in the environment, high entropy bits are obtained fairly quickly. Building on the strengths of existing secret key extraction approaches, we develop an environment adaptive secret key generation scheme that uses an adaptive lossy quantizer in conjunction with Cascade-based information reconciliation [7] and privacy amplification [14]. Our measurements show that our scheme, in comparison to the existing ones that we evaluate, performs the best in terms of generating high entropy bits at a high bit rate. The secret key bit streams generated by our scheme also pass the randomness tests of the NIST test suite [21] that we conduct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Bassham, L. E., Rukhin, A. L., Soto, J., Nechvatal, J. R., Smid, M. E., Barker, E. B., Leigh, S. D., Levenson, M., Vangel, M., Banks, D. L., et al. (2010) · NIST Special Publication 800-22 Revision 1a · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-22r1a · Cited by 3,617
Rukhin, A., Sota, J., Nechvatal, J., Smid, M., Barker, E., Leigh, S., Levenson, M., Vangel, M., Banks, D., Heckert, A., et al. (2000) · doi:10.6028/nist.sp.800-22 · Cited by 1,867
Cited by
The challenges facing physical layer security
Trappe, W. (2015) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2015.7120011 · Cited by 278
Privacy in mobile technology for personal healthcare
Avancha, S., Baxi, A., & Kotz, D. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2379776.2379779 · Cited by 229
A Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Modern Healthcare Systems: Attacks and Defenses
Newaz, A. I., Sikder, A. K., Rahman, M. A., & Uluagac, A. S. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Computing for Healthcare · doi:10.1145/3453176 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Jana, S., Premnath, S. N., Clark, M., Kasera, S. K., Patwari, N., & Krishnamurthy, S. V.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-09-20
- Pages
- 321-332
- ISSN
- 1543-5679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011582944
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 33.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the effectiveness of secret key extraction from wireless signal strength in real environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1614320.1614356
- The paper
- Jana, S., Premnath, S. N., Clark, M., Kasera, S. K., Patwari, N., & Krishnamurthy, S. V. (2009). On the effectiveness of secret key extraction from wireless signal strength in real environments. Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/1614320.1614356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.