The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On cellular botnets: measuring the impact of malicious devices on a cellular network core
Abstract
The vast expansion of interconnectivity with the Internet and the rapid evolution of highly-capable but largely insecure mobile devices threatens cellular networks. In this paper, we characterize the impact of the large scale compromise and coordination of mobile phones in attacks against the core of these networks. Through a combination of measurement, simulation and analysis, we demonstrate the ability of a botnet composed of as few as 11,750 compromised mobile phones to degrade service to area-code sized regions by 93%. As such attacks are accomplished through the execution of network service requests and not a constant stream of phone calls, users are unlikely to be aware of their occurrence. We then investigate a number of significant network bottlenecks, their impact on the density of compromised nodes per base station and how they can be avoided. We conclude by discussing a number of countermeasures that may help to partially mitigate the threats posed by such attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A survey of mobile malware in the wild
Felt, A. P., Finifter, M., Chin, E., Hanna, S., & Wagner, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Security and privacy in smartphones and mobile devices · doi:10.1145/2046614.2046618 · Cited by 768
Security and Privacy for 6G: A Survey on Prospective Technologies and Challenges
Nguyen, V.-L., Lin, P.-C., Cheng, B.-C., Hwang, R.-H., & Lin, Y.-D. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3108618 · Cited by 515
A Survey on Security for Mobile Devices
La Polla, M., Martinelli, F., & Sgandurra, D. (2013) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2012.013012.00028 · Cited by 512
Silva, S. S. C., Silva, R. M. P., Pinto, R. C. G., & Salles, R. M. (2013) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2012.07.021 · Cited by 356
Practical Attacks Against Privacy and Availability in 4G/LTE Mobile Communication Systems
Shaik, A., Borgaonkar, R., Asokan, N., Niemi, V., & Seifert, J.-P. (2016) · Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2016.23236 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Traynor, P., Lin, M., Ongtang, M., Rao, V., Jaeger, T., McDaniel, P., & La Porta, T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2009-11-09
- Pages
- 223-234
- ISSN
- 1543-7221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2115026336
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.27
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On cellular botnets: measuring the impact of malicious devices on a cellular network core. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1653662.1653690
- The paper
- Traynor, P., Lin, M., Ongtang, M., Rao, V., Jaeger, T., McDaniel, P., & La Porta, T. (2009). On cellular botnets: measuring the impact of malicious devices on a cellular network core. Proceedings of the 16th ACM conference on Computer and communications security. https://doi.org/10.1145/1653662.1653690
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.