Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Practical Attacks Against Privacy and Availability in 4G/LTE Mobile Communication Systems

Open access
Shaik, Altaf, Borgaonkar, Ravishankar, Asokan, N., Niemi, Valtteri, Seifert, Jean-Pierre·2016·Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium

Abstract

Mobile communication systems are now an essential part of life throughout the world.Fourth generation "Long Term Evolution" (LTE) mobile communication networks are being deployed.The LTE suite of specifications is considered to be significantly better than its predecessors not only in terms of functionality but also with respect to security and privacy for subscribers.We carefully analyzed LTE access network protocol specifications and uncovered several vulnerabilities.Using commercial LTE mobile devices in real LTE networks, we demonstrate inexpensive, and practical attacks exploiting these vulnerabilities.Our first class of attacks consists of three different ways of making an LTE device leak its location: In our experiments, a semi-passive attacker can locate an LTE device within a 2 km 2 area in a city whereas an active attacker can precisely locate an LTE device using GPS co-ordinates or trilateration via cell-tower signal strength information.Our second class of attacks can persistently deny some or all services to a target LTE device.To the best of our knowledge, our work constitutes the first publicly reported practical attacks against LTE access network protocols.We present several countermeasures to resist our specific attacks.We also discuss possible trade-off considerations that may explain why these vulnerabilities exist.We argue that justification for these trade-offs may no longer valid.We recommend that safety margins introduced into future specifications to address such trade-offs should incorporate greater agility to accommodate subsequent changes in the trade-off equilibrium.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.14722/ndss.2016.23236

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Shaik, A., Borgaonkar, R., Asokan, N., Niemi, V., & Seifert, J.-P.
Venue
Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium
Published
2016
OpenAlex
W1951189428
Cited by
277
References
10
FWCI
26.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Practical Attacks Against Privacy and Availability in 4G/LTE Mobile Communication Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.14722/ndss.2016.23236
The paper
Shaik, A., Borgaonkar, R., Asokan, N., Niemi, V., & Seifert, J.-P. (2016). Practical Attacks Against Privacy and Availability in 4G/LTE Mobile Communication Systems. Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security Symposium. https://doi.org/10.14722/ndss.2016.23236

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.