Cited by 50Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorUsability and User Interface DesignWeb Data Mining and Analysis

Reactive information foraging for evolving goals

Lawrance, Joseph, Burnett, Margaret, Bellamy, Rachel, Bogart, Christopher, Swart, Calvin·2010·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Information foraging models have predicted the navigation paths of people browsing the web and (more recently) of programmers while debugging, but these models do not explicitly model users' goals evolving over time. We present a new information foraging model called PFIS2 that does model information seeking with potentially evolving goals. We then evaluated variants of this model in a field study that analyzed programmers' daily navigations over a seven-month period. Our results were that PFIS2 predicted users' navigation remarkably well, even though the goals of navigation, and even the information landscape itself, were changing markedly during the pursuit of information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1753326.1753332

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawrance, J., Burnett, M., Bellamy, R., Bogart, C., & Swart, C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • IBM (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-04-10
Pages
25-34
OpenAlex
W2061632472
Cited by
50
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.92
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
information foraging, debugging, web browsing, information seeking, information environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review