Cited by 756Software Engineering ResearchSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesTeaching and Learning Programming

Towards a theory of the comprehension of computer programs

Brooks, Ruven·1983·International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7373(83)80031-5

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developers seek information to answer specific questions, test mental hypotheses, develop context, or follow leads.

    “These studies have also revealed that developers seek this information to answer specific questions that they have [23,42], to test mental hypotheses about how an existing program works [4], to develop an overall sense of context [13], or to follow leads that simply look relevant to their current task [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brooks, R.
Affiliations
ITT (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brooks, Ruven
Venue
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
543-554
ISSN
0020-7373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120704737
Cited by
756
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 27
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
Keywords
program comprehension, programmer behavior, knowledge reconstruction, software documentation, domain knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review