The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study
Open accessAbstract
At the Cognition and Programming Project, Soloway.Ehrlich, and Bonar are attemptiJ~g to (1) understand how programmers--novices and experts--read and write programs, and (2) build software environments based firmly on this psychological research that facilitate the programming process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion
Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N. (2003) · Computer Science Education · doi:10.1076/csed.13.2.137.14200 · Cited by 1,736
Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*
Vessey, I. (1991) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00344.x · Cited by 1,263
An Empirical Investigation into Programming Language Syntax
Stefik, A., & Siebert, S. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/2534973 · Cited by 295
Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help Requests
Hellas, A., Leinonen, J., Sarsa, S., Koutcheme, C., Kujanpää, L., & Sorva, J. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 · doi:10.1145/3568813.3600139 · Cited by 145
Can Better Identifier Splitting Techniques Help Feature Location?
Dit, B., Guerrouj, L., Poshyvanyk, D., & Antoniol, G. (2011) · 2011 IEEE 19th International Conference on Program Comprehension · doi:10.1109/icpc.2011.47 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Soloway, E., Bonar, J., & Ehrlich, K.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 853-860
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2051669404
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 52.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/182.358436
- The paper
- Soloway, E., Bonar, J., & Ehrlich, K. (1983). Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358436
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.