Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study

Open access
Soloway, Elliot, Bonar, Jeffrey, Ehrlich, Kate·1983·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

At the Cognition and Programming Project, Soloway.Ehrlich, and Bonar are attemptiJ~g to (1) understand how programmers--novices and experts--read and write programs, and (2) build software environments based firmly on this psychological research that facilitate the programming process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/182.358436

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Soloway, E., Bonar, J., & Ehrlich, K.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1983-11
Volume
26
Issue
11
Pages
853-860
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2051669404
Cited by
337
References
0
FWCI
52.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/182.358436
The paper
Soloway, E., Bonar, J., & Ehrlich, K. (1983). Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358436

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.