Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs
Pennington, N. (1987) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90007-7 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Students’ Misconceptions and Other Difficulties in Introductory Programming: A Literature Review
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3077618 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
CS majors' self-efficacy perceptions in CS1: results in light of social cognitive theory
Kinnunen, P., & Simon, B. (2011) · Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research · doi:10.1145/2016911.2016917 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Huda, M. (2019) · Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management · doi:10.1108/jstpm-09-2017-0044 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Liu, Y.-F., Kim, J., Wilson, C., & Bedny, M. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.59340 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
The impact of gamification on students learning engagement
Khaleel, F. L., Ashaari, N. S., & Tengku Wook, T. S. M. (2020) · International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) · doi:10.11591/ijece.v10i5.pp4965-4972 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Successful students' strategies for getting unstuck
McCartney, R., Eckerdal, A., Mostrom, J. E., Sanders, K., & Zander, C. (2007) · Proceedings of the 12th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education · doi:10.1145/1268784.1268831 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Kiesler, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3341525.3387419 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Recommendations to Create Programming Exercises to Overcome ChatGPT
Berrezueta-Guzman, J., & Krusche, S. (2023) · 2023 IEEE 35th International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) · doi:10.1109/cseet58097.2023.00031 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Comparative study between automatic hint generation approaches in Intelligent Programming Tutors
MAHDAOUI, M., NOUH, S., ALAOUI, M. S. E., & SADIQ, M. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.259 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Recommendations to Create Programming Exercises to Overcome ChatGPT
Berrezueta-Guzman, J., & Krusche, S. (2023) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/expuq · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Non-restricted Access to Model Solutions: A Good Idea?
Nygren, H., Leinonen, J., & Hellas, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education · doi:10.1145/3304221.3319768 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Robins, A., Rountree, J., & Rountree, N.
- Venue
- Computer Science Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-172
- ISSN
- 0899-3408
- 1744-5175
- Cited by
- 1,048
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
