The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protein-to-protein interactions: Technologies, databases, and algorithms
Abstract
Studying proteins and their structures has an important role for understanding protein functionalities. Recently, due to important results obtained with proteomics, a great interest has been given to interactomics , that is, the study of protein-to-protein interactions, called PPI, or more generally, interactions among macromolecules, particularly within cells. Interactomics means studying, modeling, storing, and retrieving protein-to-protein interactions as well as algorithms for manipulating, simulating, and predicting interactions. PPI data can be obtained from biological experiments studying interactions. Modeling and storing PPIs can be realized by using graph theory and graph data management, thus graph databases can be queried for further experiments. PPI graphs can be used as input for data-mining algorithms, where raw data are binary interactions forming interaction graphs, and analysis algorithms retrieve biological interactions among proteins (i.e., PPI biological meanings). For instance, predicting the interactions between two or more proteins can be obtained by mining interaction networks stored in databases. In this article we survey modeling, storing, analyzing, and manipulating PPI data. After describing the main PPI models, mostly based on graphs, the article reviews PPI data representation and storage, as well as PPI databases. Algorithms and software tools for analyzing and managing PPI networks are discussed in depth. The article concludes by discussing the main challenges and research directions in PPI networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks
Bader, G. D., & Hogue, C. W. (2003) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-4-2 · Cited by 6,072
Glover, F. (1990) · ORSA Journal on Computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2.1.4 · Cited by 5,647
The Evolution of Random Graphs
(1986) · CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics · doi:10.1090/cbms/062/06 · Cited by 5,543
Glover, F. (1989) · ORSA Journal on Computing · doi:10.1287/ijoc.1.3.190 · Cited by 5,106
Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes
Gavin, A.-C., Bösche, M., Krause, R., Grandi, P., Marzioch, M., Bauer, A., Schultz, J., Rick, J. M., Michon, A.-M., Cruciat, C.-M., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415141a · Cited by 4,759
A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Uetz, P., Giot, L., Cagney, G., Mansfield, T. A., Judson, R. S., Knight, J. R., Lockshon, D., Narayan, V., Srinivasan, M., Pochart, P., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35001009 · Cited by 4,706
The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource
Gene Ontology Consortium (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh036 · Cited by 4,579
Mitogen-Activated Protein (MAP) Kinase Pathways: Regulation and Physiological Functions*
Pearson, G., Robinson, F., Beers Gibson, T., Xu, B.-E., Karandikar, M., Berman, K., & Cobb, M. H. (2001) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.22.2.0428 · Cited by 4,034
BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets
Stark, C. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj109 · Cited by 3,960
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1109/MEMB.2005.1436466 · doi:10.1109/memb.2005.1436466
- Deng M., Proceedings of the Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, World Scientific, 140--151
- Italiano G. F. 1991. Dynamic data structures for graphs. Ph.D. dissertation Department of Computer Science Columbia University New York NY. Italiano G. F. 1991. Dynamic data structures for graphs. Ph.D. dissertation Department of Computer Science Columbia University New York NY.
- Ivanic J., 2008, Evidence of probabilistic behaviour in protein interaction networks. BMC Syst, Biol., 2, 1
- King A. 2004. Graph clustering with restricted neighbourhood search. M.S. thesis University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada. King A. 2004. Graph clustering with restricted neighbourhood search. M.S. thesis University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
- Penrose M. 2003. Geometric Random Graphs. Oxford University Press Oxford UK. Penrose M. 2003. Geometric Random Graphs. Oxford University Press Oxford UK.
- Wei C., Proceedings of the Pacific Sym- posium on Biocomputing. R. B. Altman, et al. Eds., World Scientific.
Cited by
Roh, E., Hwang, B.-U., Kim, D., Kim, B.-Y., & Lee, N.-E. (2015) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b01613 · Cited by 927
An orchestrated survey of methodologies for automated software test case generation
Anand, S., Burke, E. K., Chen, T. Y., Clark, J., Cohen, M. B., Grieskamp, W., Harman, M., Harrold, M. J., McMinn, P., Bertolino, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.061 · Cited by 668
A robust human activity recognition system using smartphone sensors and deep learning
Hassan, M. M., Uddin, M. Z., Mohamed, A., & Almogren, A. (2018) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2017.11.029 · Cited by 656
A Review of Human Activity Recognition Methods
Vrigkas, M., Nikou, C., & Kakadiaris, I. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2015.00028 · Cited by 566
A meta-analysis of online trust relationships in e-commerce.
Kim, Y., & Peterson, R. A. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2017.01.001 · Cited by 541
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannataro, M., Guzzi, P. H., & Veltri, P.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-36
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W1966631994
- Cited by
- 620
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 17.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protein-to-protein interactions: Technologies, databases, and algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1824795.1824796
- The paper
- Cannataro, M., Guzzi, P. H., & Veltri, P. (2010). Protein-to-protein interactions: Technologies, databases, and algorithms. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/1824795.1824796
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.