Cited by 686Mobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingUsability and User Interface DesignSoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside

Open access
Bernstein, Michael S., Little, Greg, Miller, Robert C., Hartmann, Björn, Ackerman, Mark S., Karger, David R., Crowell, David, Panovich, Katrina·2010·Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology

Abstract

This paper introduces architectural and interaction patterns for integrating crowdsourced human contributions directly into user interfaces. We focus on writing and editing, complex endeavors that span many levels of conceptual and pragmatic activity. Authoring tools offer help with pragmatics, but for higher-level help, writers commonly turn to other people. We thus present Soylent, a word processing interface that enables writers to call on Mechanical Turk workers to shorten, proofread, and otherwise edit parts of their documents on demand. To improve worker quality, we introduce the Find-Fix-Verify crowd programming pattern, which splits tasks into a series of generation and review stages. Evaluation studies demonstrate the feasibility of crowdsourced editing and investigate questions of reliability, cost, wait time, and work time for edits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1866029.1866078

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI reduces creative workloads by providing valuable suggestions and refining content for professional use, thereby helping writers overcome creative blocks.

    “Prior studies have shown that AI reduces creative workloads by providing valuable suggestions [10, 33] and refining content for professional use [26, 43, 83], thereby helping writers overcome creative blocks.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1145/1753326.1753470 · DOI
  2. 10.1145/1622176.1622195 · DOI
  3. 10.3115/1220175.1220223 · DOI
  4. 10.5555/1599081.1599099 · DOI
  5. }} Cypher , A. Watch What I Do . MIT Press , Cambridge, MA , 1993 . }}Cypher, A. Watch What I Do. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
  6. 10.1145/1460563.1460641 · DOI
  7. 10.1145/1753326.1753478 · DOI
  8. 10.1145/1753326.1753357 · DOI
  9. 10.1145/1357054.1357127 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0004-3702(02)00222-9 · DOI
  11. 10.1145/1518701.1518927 · DOI
  12. 10.1145/146370.146380 · DOI
  13. }} Lieberman , H. Your Wish is My Command . Morgan Kaufmann , San Francisco , 2001 . }}Lieberman, H. Your Wish is My Command. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, 2001.
  14. 10.1145/1866029.1866040 · DOI
  15. 10.1145/1240624.1240767 · DOI
  16. 10.5555/517637 · DOI
  17. 10.1145/1600150.1600175 · DOI
  18. }} Miller , R. and Myers , B . Interactive simultaneous editing of multiple text regions . USENIX '01 , ( 2001 ). }}Miller, R. and Myers, B. Interactive simultaneous editing of multiple text regions. USENIX '01, (2001).
  19. 10.1145/1753846.1753873 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.5555/1758156.1758163 · DOI
  21. 10.1145/1357054.1357169 · DOI
  22. 10.5555/1613715.1613751 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/CVPRW.2008.4562953 · DOI
  24. 10.1145/985692.985733 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bernstein, M. S., Little, G., Miller, R. C., Hartmann, B., Ackerman, M. S., Karger, D. R., Crowell, D., & Panovich, K.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Publisher
ACM
Published
2010-10-03
Pages
313-322
OpenAlex
W2127008633
Cited by
686
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 76 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 65
FWCI
58.71
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0712793)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
word processing, Mechanical Turk, authoring tools, task decomposition, worker reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review