The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
InfoSleuth: agent-based semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments
Abstract
The goal of the InfoSleuth project at MCC is to exploit and synthesize new technologies into a unified system that retrieves and processes information in an ever-changing network of information sources. InfoSleuth has its roots in the Carnot project at MCC, which specialized in integrating heterogeneous information bases. However, recent emerging technologies such as internetworking and the World Wide Web have significantly expanded the types, availability, and volume of data available to an information management system. Furthermore, in these new environments, there is no formal control over the registration of new information sources, and applications tend to be developed without complete knowledge of the resources that will be available when they are run. Federated database projects such as Carnot that do static data integration do not scale up and do not cope well with this ever-changing environment. On the other hand, recent Web technologies, based on keyword search engines, are scalable but, unlike federated databases, are incapable of accessing information based on concepts. In this experience paper, we describe the architecture, design, and implementation of a working version of InfoSleuth. We show how InfoSleuth integrates new technological developments such as agent technology, domain ontologies, brokerage, and internet computing, in support of mediated interoperation of data and services in a dynamic and open environment. We demonstrate the use of information brokering and domain ontologies as key elements for scalability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases
Agrawal, R., Imieliński, T., & Swami, A. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1993 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/170035.170072 · Cited by 14,907
A translation approach to portable ontology specifications
Gruber, T. R. (1993) · Knowledge Acquisition · doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008 · Cited by 12,752
From data mining to knowledge discovery: an overview
Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., & Smyth, P. (1996) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · Cited by 2,395
KQML as an agent communication language
Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994) · Proceedings of the third international conference on Information and knowledge management - CIKM '94 · doi:10.1145/191246.191322 · Cited by 1,482
Querying Heterogeneous Information Sources Using Source Descriptions
Levy, A. Y., Rajaraman, A., & Ordille, J. J. (1996) · Cited by 1,110
Genesereth, M. R., & Ketchpel, S. P. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/176789.176794 · Cited by 1,092
The TSIMMIS Approach to Mediation: Data Models and Languages
Garcia-Molina, H., Papakonstantinou, Y., Quass, D., Rajaraman, A., Sagiv, Y., Ullman, J., Vassalos, V., & Widom, J. (1997) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1023/a:1008683107812 · Cited by 829
Knowledge Interchange Format Version 3.0 Reference Manual
Genesereth, M. (1992) · Cited by 784
Dynamic queries for information exploration: an implementation and evaluation
Ahlberg, C., Williamson, C., & Shneiderman, B. (1992) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '92 · doi:10.1145/142750.143054 · Cited by 482
A softbot-based interface to the Internet
Etzioni, O., & Weld, D. S. (1994) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/176789.176797 · Cited by 453
Cited by
Cohen, W. W. (1998) · Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data · doi:10.1145/276304.276323 · Cited by 379
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
“R [159], tuProlog [122], Xsb [309], YAP Prolog [93] No logic AGENTFLY [322], Aglets [221], CArtAgO [298], ConArg [38], cougaar [173], JaCaMo [41], JADE-JBossESB [346], JACKAL [92], Klaim [115], Magentix2 [328], MASON [238], Moise & S-Moise+ [193], Presage2 [71], RETSINA [329], SARL APL [302] Technology not found ABLE…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Bayardo, R. J., Nodine, M., Rashid, M., Rusinkiewicz, M., Shea, R., Unnikrishnan, C., Unruh, A., Woelk, D., Bohrer, W., Brice, R., Cichocki, A., Fowler, J., Helal, A., Kashyap, V., Ksiezyk, T., & Martin, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1997
- Pages
- 195-206
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065336344
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 27.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: InfoSleuth: agent-based semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/253260.253294
- The paper
- Bayardo, R. J., Nodine, M., Rashid, M., Rusinkiewicz, M., Shea, R., Unnikrishnan, C., Unruh, A., Woelk, D., Bohrer, W., Brice, R., Cichocki, A., Fowler, J., Helal, A., Kashyap, V., Ksiezyk, T., & Martin, G. (1997). InfoSleuth: agent-based semantic integration of information in open and dynamic environments. Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data - SIGMOD '97. https://doi.org/10.1145/253260.253294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.