Cited by 169Privacy, Security, and Data ProtectionMedia and Digital CommunicationPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online

Farnham, Shelly D., Churchill, Elizabeth F.·2011·Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work

Abstract

This paper explores key issues people experience managing personal boundaries within and across social technologies. We look in particular at email and online social networks. We offer a theoretical framework for understanding the errors in assumptions about the singularity of identity that are currently inscribed into the sharing models of social technology systems. Through a questionnaire study we examine how people facet their identities and their lives, and how these facets are expressed through use of email and Facebook. We found family was an extremely important context for sharing online, and that email was still a preferred form of communication for private sharing across facets of life. Single, working men had the highest level of incompatible facets, and a higher level of facet incompatibility was correlated with increased email usage and worry about sharing in the context of social networks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1958824.1958880

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There exists a significant body of work on queer online identity management, including how being trans and visible online in everyday social media usage can be a form of political advocacy and activism.

    “There exists a significant body of work on queer online identity management [29, 75, 118], including how being trans and visible online in everyday social media usage can be a form of political advocacy and activism [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farnham, S. D., & Churchill, E. F.
Affiliations
Yahoo (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-03-19
Pages
359-368
OpenAlex
W2146342155
Cited by
169
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
47.84
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
personal boundaries, online sharing, email, Facebook, social networking sites, family communication, privacy concerns, social technology, single men

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review