Cited by 1,082Complex Network Analysis TechniquesSocial Media and PoliticsMisinformation and Its Impacts

Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter

Romero, Daniel M., Meeder, Brendan, Kleinberg, Jon·2011·Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web

Abstract

There is a widespread intuitive sense that different kinds of information spread differently on-line, but it has been difficult to evaluate this question quantitatively since it requires a setting where many different kinds of information spread in a shared environment. Here we study this issue on Twitter, analyzing the ways in which tokens known as hashtags spread on a network defined by the interactions among Twitter users. We find significant variation in the ways that widely-used hashtags on different topics spread.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/1963405.1963503

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., & Kleinberg, J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-03-28
Pages
695-704
OpenAlex
W2145446394
Cited by
1,082
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 79 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 111 · 2014: 134 · 2013: 111 · 2012: 82
FWCI
100.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
information dissemination, hashtags, Twitter, social networks, online information spread

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review