The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks
Abstract
We predict that people with different political orientations will exhibit systematically different levels of political homophily, the tendency to associate with others similar to oneself in political ideology. Research on personality differences across the political spectrum finds that both more conservative and more politically extreme individuals tend to exhibit greater orientations towards cognitive stability, clarity, and familiarity. We reason that such a “preference for certainty” may make these individuals more inclined to seek out the company of those who reaffirm, rather than challenge, their views. Since survey studies of political homophily face well‐documented methodological challenges, we instead test this proposition on a large sample of politically engaged users of the social‐networking platform Twitter , whose ideologies we infer from the politicians and policy nonprofits they follow. As predicted, we find that both more extreme and more conservative individuals tend to be more homophilous than more liberal and more moderate ones.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People who hold more liberal attitudes may have more ideologically diverse online networks than people who hold more conservative attitudes.
“People who hold more liberal attitudes may have more ideologically diverse online networks than people who hold more conservative attitudes207,228.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [228]
Because of greater openness to new experiences and more diverse social networks, individuals who embrace liberal ideology are more familiar with and knowledgeable about the cultural activities of out-group members than are individuals who embrace conservative ideology.
“These results imply that, because of greater openness to new experiences217,230 and more diverse social networks207,228, individuals who embrace liberal ideology are more familiar with and knowledgeable about the cultural activities of out-group members than are individuals who embrace conservative ideology.”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [228]
Conservatives in the U.S. are more homophilic than liberals on Twitter/X, with conservative homophily rates 3.8 times higher.
“Boutyline and Willer [73] found that conservatives in the U.S. are more homophilic than liberals on Twitter/X, with conservative homophily rates 3.8 times higher.”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Many studies found a small echo chamber effect for Republicans, but none for Democrats before and in the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. election.
“Many studies found a small echo chamber effect for Republicans, but none for Democrats before and in the aftermath of the 2016 U.S. election [70][71][72][73].”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-reported data often captures perceived rather than actual homophily, which can lead to underestimation of polarization.
“Self-reported data often captures perceived rather than actual homophily, which can lead to underestimation of polarization [73].”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Metrics like polarity scores measure the distance between users based on their attributes when group membership is unavailable.
“Metrics like polarity scores measure the distance between users based on their attributes when group membership is unavailable (e.g., [73,100]).”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Node-level homophily focuses on individual tendencies to connect with similar users.
“Node-Level Homophily: Focuses on individual tendencies to connect with similar users (e.g., [73,99]).”
From A systematic review of echo chamber research: comparative analysis of conceptualizations, operationalizations, and varying outcomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]
Cites
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491 · see citing works
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Petersen, M. A. (2008) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · Cited by 10,804 · see citing works
Jurczak, C., Adorno, T., Frenkel-Brunswik, Levinson, D., & Nevitt-Sanford, R. (1950) · The American Catholic Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3707481 · Cited by 8,397 · see citing works
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652 · see citing works
Adorno, T. W., Frenkel-Bruνswik, E., Levinson, D. M., & Sandford, R. N. (2001) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446220986.n8 · Cited by 6,459 · see citing works
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 · Cited by 4,904 · cited 3× · see citing works
“First, a long line of work from political psychology finds that more conservative individuals exhibit greater preferences for certainty than more liberal ones (Jost et al., 2003a).”
BackgroundResultInequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure
Blau, P. M. (1977) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,792 · see citing works
The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment
Centola, D. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185231 · Cited by 2,692 · see citing works
The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election: divided they blog
Adamic, L. A., & Glance, N. (2005) · Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery · doi:10.1145/1134271.1134277 · Cited by 2,619 · see citing works
A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization
Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11421 · Cited by 2,575 · see citing works
Between past and future eight exercises in political thought
Arendt, H. (1987) · Cited by 2,385 · see citing works
Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600 · Cited by 2,125 · see citing works
Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use
Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x · Cited by 1,940 · see citing works
Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties
Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/521848 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Political Polarization in the American Public
Fiorina, M. P., & Abrams, S. J. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053106.153836 · Cited by 1,798 · see citing works
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511617201 · Cited by 1,687 · see citing works
Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy
Mutz, D. C. (2006) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2388 · Cited by 1,588 · see citing works
The end of the end of ideology.
Jost, J. T. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.7.651 · Cited by 1,533 · see citing works
Simple formulas for standard errors that cluster by both firm and time
Thompson, S. B. (2010) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.016 · Cited by 1,516 · see citing works
The law of group polarization.
Sunstein, C. R. (2002) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9760.00148 · Cited by 1,371 · see citing works
The Consequences of Cross-Cutting Networks for Political Participation
Mutz, D. C. (2002) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/3088437 · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Homophily in Voluntary Organizations: Status Distance and the Composition of Face-to-Face Groups
McPherson, J. M., & Smith‐Lovin, L. (1987) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095356 · Cited by 1,186 · see citing works
Specifying the Relationship Between Social Ties and Activism
McAdam, D., & Paulsen, R. (1993) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230319 · Cited by 1,166 · see citing works
Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure
Stroud, N. J. (2008) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-007-9050-9 · Cited by 1,154 · see citing works
Romero, D. M., Meeder, B., & Kleinberg, J. (2011) · Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1963405.1963503 · Cited by 1,082 · see citing works
Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice
MUTZ, D. C. (2002) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055402004264 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. D. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355305775097542 · Cited by 1,018 · see citing works
Hogg, M. A. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8 · Cited by 990 · see citing works
Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data
Barberá, P. (2015) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpu011 · Cited by 982 · cited 15× · see citing works
“The parallels between Twitter and offline electoral politics are also illustrated by Barber a (2015), who shows that the ideological positions of members of the 112th Congress can be estimated solely from Twitter ties among their followers.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBeyond and Below Racial Homophily: ERG Models of a Friendship Network Documented on Facebook
Wimmer, A., & Lewis, K. (2010) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/653658 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements
Hoffer, E. (1951) · Cited by 638 · see citing works
Takhteyev, Y., Gruzd, A. A., & Wellman, B. (2011) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006 · Cited by 617 · see citing works
Social Structural Determinants of Similarity among Associates
Feld, S. L. (1982) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095216 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
Disagreement, Ambivalence, and Engagement: The Political Consequences of Heterogeneous Networks
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x · Cited by 576 · see citing works
The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00197 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress
BAFUMI, J., & HERRON, M. C. (2010) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000316 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?
Price, V., Cappella, J., & Nir, L. (2002) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/105846002317246506 · Cited by 469 · see citing works
The Dynamics of Protest Recruitment through an Online Network
González‐Bailón, S., Borge‐Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., & Moreno, Y. (2011) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Gupta, P. K., Goel, A., Lin, J., Sharma, A., Wang, D., & Zadeh, R. B. (2013) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/2488388.2488433 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers
Brelger, R., Carley, K. M., & Pattison, P. E. (2004) · National Academies Press eBooks · Cited by 460 · see citing works
Huntington, S. P. (1957) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952202 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.376 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.383 · Cited by 412 · see citing works
Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world
Dunbar, R., Arnaboldi, V., Conti, M., & Passarella, A. (2015) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.005 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., & Levine, J. (1995) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111668 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
The psychology of group perception : perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Judd, C. M., & Corneille, O. (2004) · Cited by 335 · see citing works
More Tweets, More Votes: Social Media as a Quantitative Indicator of Political Behavior
DiGrazia, J., McKelvey, K., Bollen, J., & Rojas, F. G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079449 · Cited by 334 · see citing works
The Structure and Dynamics of Movement Participation
Kim, H., & Bearman, P. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657453 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Segregation in Social Networks Based on Acquaintanceship and Trust
DiPrete, T. A., Gelman, A., McCormick, T. H., Teitler, J. O., & Zheng, T. (2011) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/659100 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
Social Networks and Political Participation
Campbell, D. E. (2013) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-033011-201728 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2011) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Obar, J. A., Zube, P., & Lampe, C. (2012) · Journal of Information Policy · doi:10.5325/jinfopoli.2.2012.0001 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias.
Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.2.383 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Disagreeing About Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior
Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A., & McClurg, S. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2012) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00571.x · Cited by 227 · see citing works
The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes
Lazer, D. M. J., Rubineau, B., Chetkovich, C., Katz, N. R., & Neblo, M. A. (2010) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2010.500187 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Real and perceived attitude agreement in social networks.
Goel, S., Mason, W., & Watts, D. J. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020697 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Reflections on Conceptualizing and Measuring Tie Strength
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (2012) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sos112 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction
Knoke, D. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579133 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
The Structure and Dynamics of Movement Participation
Kim, H., & Bearman, P. (1997) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.7916/d8-yjz5-5y54 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction
Knoke, D. (1990) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/68.4.1041 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Hatemi, P., McDermott, R., Eaves, L. J., Kendler, K. S., & Neale, M. C. (2013) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12016 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Public Opinion in the U.S. States: 1956 to 2010
Enns, P. K., & Koch, J. (2013) · State Politics & Policy Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1532440013496439 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
What's congress doing on twitter?
Hemphill, L., Otterbacher, J., & Shapiro, M. A. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441876 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Brenner, A. S. A. J. (2012) · Cited by 110 · see citing works
In-group variability and motivation to reduce subjective uncertainty.
Jetten, J., Hogg, M. A., & Mullin, B. (2000) · Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice · doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.2.184 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Laumann, E. O. (1969) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786634 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Unav (2009) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/mxrkua · Cited by 92 · see citing works
A method for computing political preference among Twitter followers
Golbeck, J., & Hansen, D. L. (2013) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.07.004 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Hogg, M. A. (2004) · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Hohman, Z. P., Hogg, M. A., & Bligh, M. C. (2009) · Self and Identity · doi:10.1080/15298860802605937 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Butler, D. M. (2009) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.3162/036298009788897763 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Are Diverse Political Networks Always Bad for Participatory Democracy?
Jang, S.-J. (2009) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x09332790 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. D. (1989) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791645 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Predictability of Large-scale Spatially Embedded Networks
Butts, C. T. (2002) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Stewart, C. H., III, & Woon, J. (2005) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
OVERVIEW_OF_LOCAL_STATE_OF_THE_ENVIRONMENT_Ibrahim_A_Alam_Vice_Mayor_Jeddah_Municipality
civil, C. (n.d.) · Research Publication Repository of King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals) · Cited by 18 · see citing works
CQ Press Voting and Elections Collection
Johnson, Q. (2017) · CC Advisor · doi:10.5260/cca.199291 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Disagreeing about Disagreement
Kim, E. (2015) · 언어학 연구 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Affiliation as a function of attitude discrepancy with another and arousal‐seeking tendency1
Mehrabian, A. (1975) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00723.x · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Liu, T.-P., Dai, S.-C., & Wu, C.-L. (2013) · East Asia · doi:10.1007/s12140-013-9190-y · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media
Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552 · Cited by 1,806 · see citing works
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1618923114 · Cited by 1,396 · see citing works
Colleoni, E., Rozza, A., & Arvidsson, A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12084 · Cited by 1,151 · see citing works
The Potential of Generative AI for Personalized Persuasion at Scale
Matz, S., Teeny, J., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/rn97c · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
The potential of generative AI for personalized persuasion at scale
Matz, S. C., Teeny, J. D., Vaid, S. S., Peters, H., Harari, G. M., & Cerf, M. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-53755-0 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Does online technology make us more or less sociable? A preliminary review and call for research
Waytz, A., & Gray, K. (2018) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691617746509 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Clark, C. J., & Winegard, B. M. (2020) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2020.1721233 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Why addressing digital inequality should be a priority
Imran, A. (2023) · THE ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES · doi:10.1002/isd2.12255 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Shared partisanship dramatically increases social tie formation in a Twitter field experiment
Mosleh, M., Martel, C., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2022761118 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“Of course, here we studied (at least somewhat) politically active Twitter users, who are not representative of either Twitter users or the country as a whole.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAn Asymmetrical “President-in-Power” Effect
MORISI, D., JOST, J. T., & SINGH, V. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000850 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Hartmann, D., Wang, S. M., Pohlmann, L., & Berendt, B. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00381-z · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Kozlowski, A. C., & Murphy, J. P. (2021) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102498 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Koiranen, I., Koivula, A., Keipi, T., & Saarinen, A. (2019) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.11.009 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Liberals as Cultural Omnivores
Rogers, N., & Jost, J. T. (2022) · Journal of the Association for Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/719581 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Castillo-de-Mesa, J., Méndez-Domínguez, P., Carbonero-Muñoz, D., & Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2021) · Redes. Revista hispana para el análisis de redes sociales · doi:10.5565/rev/redes.913 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Suk, J., McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2023) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-022-09801-6 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boutyline, A., & Willer, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Boutyline, Andrei
- Venue
- Political Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-05-05
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 551-569
- ISSN
- 0162-895X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9221
- OpenAlex
- W2345368148
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 98.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Political Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Keywords
- political homophily, echo chambers, political ideology, political extremism, conservatism, social networks, Twitter, online political engagement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
