Cited by 5Usability and User Interface DesignMobile and Web ApplicationsWeb and Library Services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TwitApp: in-product micro-blogging for design sharing

Li, Wei, Grossman, Tovi, Matejka, Justin, Fitzmaurice, George·2011·Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology

Abstract

We describe TwitApp, an enhanced micro-blogging system integrated within AutoCAD for design sharing. TwitApp integrates rich content and still keeps the sharing transaction cost low. In TwitApp, tweets are organized by their project, and users can follow or unfollow each individual project. We introduce the concept of automatic tweet drafting and other novel features such as enhanced real-time search and integrated live video streaming. The TwitApp system leverages the existing Twitter micro-blogging system. We also contribute a study which provides insights on these concepts and associated designs, and demonstrates potential user excitement of such tools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2047196.2047219

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Older adults' technology use has progressed towards more complex software use.

    “results of two research studies about older adults' technology use in 2010 and 2019 shows a progression towards more complex software use by older adults [40,69].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Reinhardt , W. , M. Ebner , et al. ( 2009 ). How people are using Twitter during conferences . 5th EduMedia Conference. Reinhardt, W., M. Ebner, et al. (2009). How people are using Twitter during conferences. 5th EduMedia Conference.
  2. Shamma , D. A. and E. F. Churchill ( 2010 ). Tweetgeist: can the Twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events? ACM CSCW 2010. Shamma, D. A. and E. F. Churchill (2010). Tweetgeist: can the Twitter timeline reveal the structure of broadcast events? ACM CSCW 2010.
  3. VASCELLARO, J. E. ( 2007 ) Social networking goes professional Wall Street Journa . VASCELLARO, J. E. (2007) Social networking goes professional Wall Street Journa.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, W., Grossman, T., Matejka, J., & Fitzmaurice, G.
Affiliations
Autodesk (Canada) (CA)
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Publisher
ACM
Published
2011-10-16
Pages
185-194
OpenAlex
W2110304680
Cited by
5
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile and Web Applications
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Web and Library Services
Keywords
microblogging, Twitter, AutoCAD, design sharing, real-time search, live streaming, CAD integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review