The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“I Would Just Ask Someone”: Learning Feature-Rich Design Software in the Modern Workplace
Abstract
Design professionals increasingly need to learn and use multiple feature-rich software to design complex artifacts in a variety of domains. In this work, we aimed to understand how design professionals learn new software features and seek help in today's modern workplace of interconnected spaces and increased access to shared online learning resources. We conducted 20 interviews with design professionals working in different disciplines such as architecture and planning, construction, structural design, and broadcast media, who used complex feature-rich applications on a daily basis. We found that despite the wide availability of learning resources on the web and decades of research dedicated to workplace knowledge management tools, design professionals still rely heavily on interpersonal help-seeking. Furthermore, while companies have devised a variety of technological channels to answer employees' help requests, such intermediate tools were often abandoned, and help-seeking conversations shifted to face-to-face learning episodes. Our findings point to design opportunities and shortcomings in the design of remote communication tools when seeking help for feature-rich software applications.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many users prefer to seek targeted and personalized help from someone they know.
“many users prefer to seek targeted and personalized help from someone they know [33]”
From Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software (2024) · cites this paper as [33]
Citations
Cites
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1523_4 · Cited by 1,983
Scientific Collaboration on the Internet
(2008) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262151207.001.0001 · Cited by 286
Does Distance Still Matter? Revisiting the CSCW Fundamentals on Distributed Collaboration
Bjørn, P., Esbensen, M., Jensen, R. E., & Matthiesen, S. (2014) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2670534 · Cited by 147
Community enhanced tutorials: improving tutorials with multiple demonstrations
Lafreniere, B., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2013) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466235 · Cited by 74
Self-citationTaggedComments: promoting and integrating user comments in online application tutorials
Bunt, A., Dubois, P., Lafreniere, B., Terry, M. A., & Cormack, D. T. (2014) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2556288.2557118 · Cited by 19
Self-citationTwitApp: in-product micro-blogging for design sharing
Li, W., Grossman, T., Matejka, J., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2011) · Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/2047196.2047219 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 63
- 10.1145/1183463.1183464 · DOI
- jones, 2008, Keeping Found Things Found The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management
- 10.1145/2470654.2470685 · DOI
- 10.1108/13673270110411733 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10606-013-9192-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2858036.2858131 · DOI
- 10.1145/3134737 · DOI
- 10.1145/2207676.2208620 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3173574.3173859 · DOI
- novick, 2006, Why don’t people read the manual?, Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM International Conference on Design of Communication, 11
- 10.1145/2047196.2047218 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2901790.2901827 · DOI
- 10.1145/2567788 · DOI
- carroll, 1990, The Nurnberg Funnel Designing Minimalist Instruction for Practical Computer Skill
- eason, 1988, Information Technology and Organisational Change
- 10.1145/1357054.1357224 · DOI
- 10.1145/289444.289506 · DOI
- 10.1145/1294211.1294230 · DOI
- 10.1145/1518701.1518712 · DOI
- strauss, 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
- 10.1016/j.autcon.2004.07.002 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-08-051574-8.50073-X · DOI
- 10.1145/1518701.1518803 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1621995.1622014 · DOI
- hudson, 2018, Investigating how online help and learning resources support children’s use of 3D design software, Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 257:1
- 10.1017/CBO9780511629402 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1456536.1456538 · DOI
- 10.1145/2666216.2666221 · DOI
- lafreniere, 2010, Characterizing large-scale use of a direct manipulation application in the wild, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2010, 11
- 10.1007/s10606-015-9230-9 · DOI
- 10.1145/192844.193019 · DOI
- 10.1145/3272973.3274060 · DOI
- 10.1145/3272973.3272987 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-94-011-4441-4_8 · DOI
- 10.1287/isre.5.4.400 · DOI
- linton, 2000, OWL: a recommender system for organization-wide learning, Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 3, 62
- 10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_1 · DOI
- 10.1108/09593849610111553 · DOI
- 10.1145/1054972.1055047 · DOI
- 10.1145/2207676.2208549 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/6208.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1145/2686612.2686620 · DOI
- 10.1145/2047196.2047213 · DOI
- 10.1145/3290605.3300570 · DOI
- 10.1145/105783.105788 · DOI
- 10.1145/234526.234527 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/91474.91485 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10606-005-9007-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/1621995.1622022 · DOI
- 10.1561/1100000009 · DOI
- 10.1145/2642918.2647420 · DOI
- 10.1145/154425.154426 · DOI
- 10.1145/3290605.3300527 · DOI
- 10.1145/2901790.2901849 · DOI
- 10.1145/169059.169255 · DOI
- 10.1145/1753326.1753552 · DOI
- 10.2307/249700 · DOI
- schlager, 1996, Mentors in the classroom: bringing the world outside in, Situated Learning Perspectives, 243
- 10.1145/99332.99357 · DOI
- 10.1145/2809563.2809614 · DOI
- 10.1108/03090590710746414 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-540-75195-3_12 · DOI
- hara, 2008, Communities of Practice Fostering Peer-to-Peer Learning and Informal Knowledge Sharing in the Workplace
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gmeiner, F., Yang, H., Yao, L., Holstein, K., & Martelaro, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580999 · Cited by 130
Older Adults' Collaborative Learning Dynamics When Exploring Feature-Rich Software
Baghestani, A., Latulipe, C., & Bunt, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637378 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kiani, K., Chilana, P. K., Bunt, A., Grossman, T., & Fitzmaurice, G.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Autodesk (Canada) (CA)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-08
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1943-6092 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042918884
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 2.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Keywords
- help-seeking, design professionals, software learning, online learning resources, face-to-face learning, architecture and planning, construction design, broadcast media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review