The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The domesticated robot: design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place
Open accessAbstract
Many older adults wish to remain in their own homes as they age [16]. However, challenges in performing home upkeep tasks threaten an older adult's ability to age in place. Even healthy independently living older adults experience challenges in maintaining their home [13]. Challenges with home tasks can be compensated through technology, such as home robots. However, for home robots to be adopted by older adult users, they must be designed to meet older adults' needs for assistance and the older users must be amenable to robot assistance for those needs. We conducted a needs assessment to (1) assess older adults' openness to assistance from robots; and (2) understand older adults' opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home. We administered questionnaires and conducted structured group interviews with 21 independently living older adults (ages 65-93). The questionnaire data suggest that older adults prefer robot assistance for cleaning and fetching/organizing tasks overall. However their assistance preferences discriminated between tasks. The interview data provided insight as to why they hold such preferences. Older adults reported benefits of robot assistance (e.g., the robot compensating for limitations, saving them time and effort, completing undesirable tasks, and performing tasks at a high level of performance). Participants also reported concerns such as the robot damaging the environment, being unreliable at or incapable of doing a task, doing tasks the older adult would rather do, or taking up too much space/storage. These data, along with specific comments from participant interviews, provide the basis for preliminary recommendations for designing mobile manipulator robots to support aging in place.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Specific to older adults, some studies in HCI and HRI indicate older adults' preference for using robots for household purposes more than for companionship [5,13]”
From "Phantom Friend" or "Just a Box with Information": Personification and Ontological Categorization of Smart Speaker-based Voice Assistants by Older Adults (2019) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Most of these studies do not include the actual robot, and they instead rely on video demonstrations [6, 16], storyboard images showing what a robot may do [5], or other images of robots [9].”
From Situated Participatory Design: A Method for In Situ Design of Robotic Interaction with Older Adults (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baltes, P. B., & Baltes, M. M. (1990) · Successful Aging · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511665684.003 · Cited by 3,739 · cited 3×
“Successful aging may be conceptualized by the selection, optimization and compensation model (SOC model) [2].”
InfluentialEcology and the aging process.
Lawton, M. P., & Nahemow, L. (1973) · The psychology of adult development and aging. · doi:10.1037/10044-020 · Cited by 2,191 · cited 2×
“Lawton and Nahemow [21] stated that ideally an individual's competency should match the environmental press.”
Czaja, S. J., Charness, N., Fisk, A. D., Hertzog, C., Nair, S. N., Rogers, W. A., & Sharit, J. (2006) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.333 · Cited by 2,113 · cited 1×
“Prior to the structured group interview, demographic, health, and technology experience were collected using standardized materials developed by the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) [10].”
Self-citationAcceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., & MacDonald, B. (2009) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6 · Cited by 887 · cited 1×
“A design aspect to consider is customizability (sometimes referred to as adaptability; [3]).”
Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., & Sharit, J. (2004) · doi:10.1201/9781420023862 · Cited by 781
Self-citationQuick, S. (2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-4209 · Cited by 416
Melenhorst, A.-S., Rogers, W. A., & Bouwhuis, D. G. (2006) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.190 · Cited by 363 · cited 1×
“More generally, older adults are willing to use home technological assistance, if the perceived benefits of using the technology are clear [22] .”
Self-citationAutominder: an intelligent cognitive orthotic system for people with memory impairment
Pollack, M. E., Brown, L., Colbry, D., McCarthy, C. E., Orosz, C., Peintner, B., Ramakrishnan, S., & Tsamardinos, I. (2003) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/s0921-8890(03)00077-0 · Cited by 359 · cited 1×
“There have been some efforts on developing robots for those with declined health capabilities, such as individuals with motor impairments [8] [19], dementia [28], or needing healthcare assistance [23].”
Conducting Research on Home Environments: Lessons Learned and New Directions
Gitlin, L. N. (2003) · The Gerontologist · doi:10.1093/geront/43.5.628 · Cited by 354 · cited 2×
“Many older adults wish to remain in their own homes as they age [16].”
Robot therapy for elders affected by dementia
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Musha, T., & Kimura, S. (2008) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/memb.2008.919496 · Cited by 229 · cited 1×
“There have been some efforts on developing robots for those with declined health capabilities, such as individuals with motor impairments [8] [19], dementia [28], or needing healthcare assistance [23].”
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- AARP. ( 2005 , April). Beyond 50.05 survey . Retrieved February 13, 2009, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/beyond_50_05_survey.pdf AARP. (2005, April). Beyond 50.05 survey. Retrieved February 13, 2009, from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/beyond_50_05_survey.pdf
- Broadbent E. Tamagawa R. Patience A. Knock B. Kerse N. Day K. and MacDonald B. A. 2011. Attitudes towards health-care robots in a retirement village. Australas. J. Ageing. DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741--6612.2011.00551.x. 10.1111/j.1741--6612.2011.00551.x · DOI
- 10.5555/2035304.2035336 · DOI
- Fisk , A. D. , Rogers , W., A. , Charness , N. , Czaja , S. J. , and Sharit , J . 2009 . Designing for Older Adults: Principles and creative Human Factors Approaches ( 2ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W., A., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., and Sharit, J. 2009. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and creative Human Factors Approaches (2ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Smarr , C.-A. , Fausset , C. B. , and Rogers , W. A . 2011 . Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment (HFA-TR- 1102). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech, School of Psychology, Human Factors and Aging Laboratory . http://hdl.handle.net/1853/39670 Smarr, C.-A., Fausset, C. B., and Rogers, W. A. 2011. Understanding the potential for robot assistance for older adults in the home environment (HFA-TR-1102). Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech, School of Psychology, Human Factors and Aging Laboratory. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/39670
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–165 of 165
Reppou, S. E., & Karagiannis, G. T. (2015) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15847-1_23 · Cited by 10
“All they need to do is just ask the robots to do it for them [20, 21].”
BackgroundRoboParrot 2.0: A multi-purpose social robot
Shayan, A. M., Sarmadi, A., Pirastehzad, A., Moradi, H., & Soleiman, P. (2016) · doi:10.1109/icrom.2016.7886775 · Cited by 10
“RoboParrot applications can also be extended in the field of autonomous health care for assisting elderly people in everyday tasks, reminding them to take medications and monitor their physical and emotional well-being to help older adults successfully age in place [26, 27].”
BackgroundOpfermann, C., Pitsch, K., Yaghoubzadeh, R., & Kopp, S. (2017) · Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Human Agent Interaction · doi:10.1145/3125739.3125752 · Cited by 10
Abhari, S., McMurray, J., Randhawa, T., Noon, G. B., Hanjahanja-Phiri, T., McNeil, H., Manning, F., Debergue, P., Teague, J., & Morita, P. P. (2024) · JMIR Aging · doi:10.2196/58196 · Cited by 11
Muthugala, M. A. V. J., & Jayasekara, A. G. B. P. (2015) · Moratuwa Engineering Research Conference (MERCon) · doi:10.1109/mercon.2015.7112332 · Cited by 9
“The idea of realizing the dream for a perfect assistive robot obviously depends on the availability of the humanhuman like interactions in human-robot interactions also [3], [9].”
BackgroundAging in Smart Environments for Independence
Miller, J., McDaniel, T. L., & Bernstein, M. J. (2020) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas50296.2020.9462211 · Cited by 9
Bridging HRI Theory and Practice: Design Guidelines for Robot Communication in Dairy Farming
Cila, N., González, I. G., Jacobs, J., & Rozendaal, M. C. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634991 · Cited by 9
Ranganeni, V., Dhat, V., Ponto, N., & Çakmak, M. (2024) · ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST) · doi:10.1145/3654777.3676355 · Cited by 8
“Formative research with motor-limited individuals, including older adults, have revealed the potential of robots in enhancing independence and understanding the potential users’ attitudes and preferences [1, 4–6 , 16].”
Challenges in Seniors Adopting Assistive Robots: A Systematic Review
Ariani, A., Kapadia, V., Talaei‐Khoei, A., Li, J., & RAY, P. K. (2016) · The International Technology Management Review · doi:10.2991/itmr.2016.6.2.1 · Cited by 9
“Countering these negative situations, Beer et al.(46) recommended adding features to establish dynamic interactions between assistive robots and users.”
BackgroundInfluentialOlder adults’ expectations, experiences, and preferences in programming physical robot assistance
Ajaykumar, G., Pineda, K. T., & Huang, C. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103127 · Cited by 9
Identifying Specific Reasons Behind Unmet Needs May Inform More Specific Eldercare Robot Design
Stafford, R. Q., MacDonald, B. A., & Broadbent, E. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_15 · Cited by 8
“Therefore incorporating a greater understanding of user needs into the design process may aid development of more specific robot design guidelines [3, 24].”
BackgroundInfluentialHidoussi, K. D., Dubois, M., Gandit, M., & Methni, J. E. (2016) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/j.pto.2015.12.004 · Cited by 7
Esposito, A. A., Amorese, T., Cuciniello, M., Cavallo, F., Vinciarelli, A., & Cordasco, G. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-08838-4_6 · Cited by 7
Beer, J. M., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2015) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931215591015 · Cited by 7
“Participants were introduced to the PR2 (Figure 1) via an 8-minute narrated video consisting of a collage of video clips (also used in Beer et al., 2012; Smarr et al., 2014).”
MethodSelf-citationEffects of robot capability on user acceptance
Cha, E., Dragan, A. D., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2013) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2013.6483519 · Cited by 7
Testing an assistive fetch robot with spatial language from older and younger adults
Skubic, M., Huo, Z., Alexenko, T., Carlson, L. A., & Miller, J. E. (2013) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2013.6628394 · Cited by 6
Peeters, M. M. M. (2016) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE) · doi:10.5220/0005913000610066 · Cited by 6
“Needs assessment All target groups participate in structured group interviews (Beer et al., 2012; Peeters, 2014) at their meeting centres to obtain information about the needs of the target groups in relation to personal memory support, and opportunities and requirements for a ReMindMe application to meet those needs.”
BackgroundCo-Robots: Humans and Robots Operating as Partners
Scassellati, B. M., & Tsui, K. M. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_27-1 · Cited by 6
SHEBA: A Low-Cost Assistive Robot for Older Adults in the Developing World
Motahar, T., Farden, M. F., Sarkar, D. P., Islam, M. A., Cabrera, M. E., & Çakmak, M. (2019) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956402 · Cited by 6
“entertainment), and certain chores, like meal preparation [4], [34].”
BackgroundRGB-D sensor setup for multiple tasks of home robots and experimental results
de la Puente, P., Bajones, M., Einramhof, P., Wolf, D., Fischinger, D., & Vincze, M. (2014) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942915 · Cited by 6
“Extensive studies enumerate plenty of tasks [26] also including the use of state-of-the-art AAL features [27], [28].”
BackgroundYoo, H.-Y., & Kim, M. (2024) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs14111070 · Cited by 5
Dr.VCoach: employment of advanced deep learning and human–robot interaction for virtual coaching
Cauli, N., & Recupero, D. R. (2025) · Intelligent Service Robotics · doi:10.1007/s11370-025-00603-3 · Cited by 5
Huang, G. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_8 · Cited by 6
Fasola, J., & Matarić, M. J. (2015) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2015.7333611 · Cited by 5
“Spatially-oriented tasks such as fetching and moving objects are commonly referenced among the tasks most desired by older adults for household service robots to perform [1].”
BackgroundMuthugala, M. A. V. J., & Jayasekara, A. G. B. P. (2017) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206568 · Cited by 5
“They could be used to support the typical daily activities in domestic environments [4], [5] or could be used as a supportive aid for human caregivers in dedicated caring environments for older people such as nursing homes [6].”
BackgroundEvaluating the Use of a Robot in a Hematological Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Study
Falcone, M., D’Onofrio, G., Iannacone, G., Steduto, M., Carella, A. M., Giuliani, F., & Ricciardi, F. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23208365 · Cited by 5
“Specifically, regarding social and assistive robots, studies that involve users during the design process have shown excellent results in terms of overall user experience and acceptance of the robotic technology [17–19].”
BackgroundExploring the Acceptance and Adoption of Humanoid Robots Among Older Adults: Systematic Review
Elsheikh, A., & Al‐Thani, D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61698-3_25 · Cited by 5
Using spatial language to drive a robot for an indoor environment fetch task
Huo, Z., Alexenko, T., & Skubic, M. (2014) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2014.6942734 · Cited by 5
Effects of robot capability on user acceptance
Cha, E., Dragan, A. D., & Srinivasa, S. S. (2013) · KiltHub Repository · doi:10.5555/2447556.2447585 · Cited by 5
Addressing cognitive impairment among elderly people: A techno-spiritual perspective
Ismail, J., Noor, N. L. M., & Isa, W. A. R. W. M. (2014) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M) · doi:10.1109/ict4m.2014.7020618 · Cited by 5
Socially Assistive Robots for Storytelling and Other Activities to Support Aging in Place
Miller, J., & McDaniel, T. L. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70716-3_6 · Cited by 5
Longitudinal Proactive Robot Assistance
Patel, M. (2023) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3568294.3579982 · Cited by 5
Co-Robots: Humans and Robots Operating as Partners
Scassellati, B. M., & Tsui, K. M. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_27 · Cited by 5
Home Trials of Robotic Systems: Challenges and Considerations for Evaluation Teams
Adami, I., Antona, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40238-3_28 · Cited by 4
Technologies Developed for Older Adults: Trends and Directions
Al-Khalifa, H. S., Al-Twaim, M., Al-Mohsin, M., & Al‐Razgan, M. (2014) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07854-0_49 · Cited by 4
Beyond Assistance: Robots Aligned with Older Adults' Values
Simão, H., Bernardino, A. J. M., Guerreiro, T., & Forlizzi, J. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610978.3638357 · Cited by 3
Underground mine rescue robotic systems: insights into human-robot information exchange
Bakzadeh, R., Alhaj-Bedar, R., Wilson, S., Androulakis, V., Khaniani, H., Shao, S., Hassanalian, M., & Roghanchi, P. (2026) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2026.1698570 · Cited by 3
“Beer et al. interviewed older adults to inform assistive robot design for aging in place, emphasizing independence and safety (Beer et al., 2012).”
Human attention estimation by a domestic service robot using upper body skeletal information
Sirithunge, H. P. C., Jayasekara, A. G. B. P., & Chandima, D. P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems (ICIIS) · doi:10.1109/iciinfs.2017.8300421 · Cited by 3
“Service robots are available today, as a solution to the crisis of caretakers with the rise of disabled and elderly population [1]–[3].”
BackgroundExploring Social Robots for Healthy Older Adults: Aging With Companionship
Tschida, J., Michael, K., & McDaniel, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2024.3521341 · Cited by 3
Luciano, A., Pascale, F., & Polverino, F. (2023) · Journal of Aging and Environment · doi:10.1080/26892618.2023.2275777 · Cited by 2
“According to the literature, most older adults prefer living in their own homes as long as possible (AARP, 2018; Beer et al., 2012; Falasca, 2018; Kerbler 2014; Sixsmith et al., 2014; Smith et al., 2012; Yen & Anderson, 2012) as the physical, cognitive, and emotional bond that an individual…”
A hierarchy category of socially assistive robots’ functions: Insights from older adults
Chen, Y., Zhao, Q., Liu, M., Ma, G., & Zhuang, X. (2025) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.2024.2446347 · Cited by 2
“We sourced SARs functions from previous studies targeting robot functions for older adults (Beer et al., 2012; Dautenhahn et al., 2005; Ezer, 2008; Fattal et al., 2022; Huang et al., 2023; Shishehgar et al., 2018; Smarr et al., 2014).”
Assessing the effectiveness of older adults' spatial descriptions in a fetch task.
Carlson, L. A., Skubic, M., Miller, J. E., Huo, Z., & Alexenko, T. (2013) · Cited by 2
Petrich, L., Jin, J., Dehghan, M., & Jägersand, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02750 · Cited by 2
“A common approach that drives research is to ask patients and caregivers (nurses or family/friends) for their preferences when it comes to robotic assistance [20], [21].”
Feedback modalities for a table setting robot assistant for elder carePreprint
Markfeld, N., Olatunji, S., Gutman, D., Givati, S., Sarne‐Fleischmann, V., & Edan, Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.08428 · Cited by 2
“The older person has perceptual abilities distinct from those of the younger population particularly evident in processing information [3].”
BackgroundIntegrating Assistive Robots into Professional Caregivers’ Workflow in Aging Healthcare
Tsai, Y.-L., Mattas, R. J., Pereira, A. E., Shim, J. E., Ali, A. F. A., Byambasuren, Z., Syed, A., Olatunji, S., Mudar, R. A., & Rogers, W. A. (2025) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/10711813251369864 · Cited by 1
“These findings align with previous research emphasizing the importance of designing robotic assistance that supports caregiver workflows and adapts to resident needs (Bayles et al., 2023; Beer et al., 2012; Olatunji et al., 2024).”
Self-citationIn Search of Informal Caregivers in HRI: A Critical Narrative Review of HRI Conference Papers
Tanqueray, L., Larsson, S., & Winkle, K. (2026) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-025-01340-4 · Cited by 2
Robots for older adults: According to useras required
Ho, Y., Sato-Shimokawara, E., Yamaguchi, T., & Tagawa, N. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE) · doi:10.1109/isie.2017.8001561 · Cited by 1
“[16] conducted a needs assessment to assess older adults’ openness to assistance from robots; and understand older adults’ opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home.”
BackgroundScenario Development for Successful Aeging with Robot Companions
Richter, K., & Döring, N. M. (2015) · International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE) · doi:10.5220/0005429402110218 · Cited by 1
“It is important to consider the users’ current level of needs (e.g. Beer et al., 2012).”
BackgroundA pre-investigation for social robotics for older adults based on user expectations
Ho, Y., Sato-Shimokawara, E., Yamaguchi, T., & Tagawa, N. (2017) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2017.8172466 · Cited by 1
“[12] conducted a needs assessment to assess older adults’ openness to assistance from robots; and understand older adults’ opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home.”
BackgroundPrakash, A. (2013) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 1
Self-citationPresentation and Analysis of a Multimodal Dataset for Grounded Language LearningPreprint
Jenkins, P., Sachdeva, R., Kebe, G. Y., Higgins, P., Darvish, K., Raff, E., Engel, D., Winder, J., Ferraro, F., & Matuszek, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13016/m24vfu-goza · Cited by 3
I want one too! Domestication of Assistive Robots
Frennert, S. (2012) · Lund University Publications (Lund University)
Smart Social Robotics for 4G-Health Applications
Istepanian, R. S. H., Good, A., & Philip, N. Y. (2013) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00846-2_473
“Many studies have addressed the issue of ‘social acceptance’ [12] given that the social capability of the robot can potentially impact upon user acceptance and subsequently, the quality of the interaction.”
BackgroundVincze, M., Wolf, D., Bajones, M., Weiss, A., Suchi, M., Fischinger, D., Pripfl, J., & Gisinger, C. (2016) · Advances in Computer-Human Interaction
Knowledge to design an assistant robotics system for aged people
Ho, Y. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT) · doi:10.1109/icit.2018.8352491
“[17] conducted a needs assessment to assess aged people’ openness to assistance from robots; and understand aged people’ opinions about using an assistive robot to help around the home.”
BackgroundAspiración y Expectativa: Un Estudio de Percepción Social Sobre Robot Imaginario
Hyunanda, V. F., & Ramírez, J. P. (2023) · CONCEPT · doi:10.37130/767fzd09
“…el tema de los robots sociales explica que ofrecerían soluciones alternativas para enfrentar algunos desafíos económicos y sociales por los mayores, especialmente para reducir la degradación funcional y aislamiento social en la tercera edad (Beer, 2012; Forlizzi, DiSalvo, & Gemperle, 2004).”
BackgroundPower, S. R., Smith, K. N., Abedine, R., Burton, L., Adams, A. E., & Beer, J. M. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-61546-7_6
Self-citationConcept Acceptance and Attitude Change of Fluffy Robot for Elderly Individuals
Saito, M., Yamaguchi, J., & Li, Q. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3765766.3765778
“Interaction is a crucial feature for robots that have been designed to provide physical support to the elderly with tasks such as moving an object [6].”
When to Explain: Field Study Insights on Robot Failure Explanations for Older Adults
Love, T., Bermejo, V., Olivares‐Alarcos, A., Andriella, A., Vallès-Peris, N., Barruè, C., & Alenyà, G. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3776734.3794462
“As populations age, there is an increasing focus on “ageing in place”, where older adults maintain their independence by continuing to live in their own homes rather than transitioning to assisted living facilities [4].”
Alizadeh, M., Lee, M., Randall, D. W., Tolmie, P., Pins, D., & Stevens, G. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791782
BÜLBÜL, A. (2026) · Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.61904/sbe.1734831
Yang, Y.-T. T., Neef, C., & Bruno, B. (2026) · ACM Interactive Health Conference · doi:10.1145/3786579.3804921
Aquilina, Y., Saliba, M. A., & Fabri, S. G. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2716454
Korpan, R. (2026) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1080/01691864.2026.2724673
Metadata
- Authors
- Beer, J. M., Smarr, C.-A., Chen, T. L., Prakash, A., Mitzner, T. L., Kemp, C. C., & Rogers, W. A.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-03-05
- Volume
- 2012
- Pages
- 335-342
- PMC
- PMC6592031
- OpenAlex
- W2113295453
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 32.69
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (P01AG017211)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Keywords
- home robots, assistive robots, aging in place, older adults, needs assessment, robot acceptance, cleaning tasks, mobile manipulators, user preferences, user concerns
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review