The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Procera: a language for high-level reactive network control
Open accessAbstract
Our previous experience building systems for implementing network policies in home and enterprise networks has revealed that the intuitive notion of network policy in these domains is inherently dynamic and stateful. Current configuration languages, both in traditional network architectures and in OpenFlow systems, are not expressive enough to capture these policies. As a result, most prototype OpenFlow systems lack a configurable interface and instead require operators to program in the system implementation language, often C++. We describe Procera, a control architecture for software-defined networking (SDN) that includes a declarative policy language based on the notion of functional reactive programming; we extend this formalism with both signals relevant for expressing high-level network policies in a variety of network settings, including home and enterprise networks, and a collection of constructs expressing temporal queries over event streams that occur frequently in network policies. Although sophisticated users can take advantage of Procera's full expressiveness by expressing network policies directly in Procera, simpler configuration interfaces (e.g., graphical user interfaces) can also easily be built on top of this formalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time
Paxson, V. (1999) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00112-7 · Cited by 2,636
Understanding BGP misconfiguration
Mahajan, R., Wetherall, D., & Anderson, T. (2002) · Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/633025.633027 · Cited by 533
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A Survey of Software-Defined Networking: Past, Present, and Future of Programmable Networks
Nunes, B. A. A., Mendonca, M., Nguyen, X.-N., Obraczka, K., & Turletti, T. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2014.012214.00180 · Cited by 2,203
Improving network management with software defined networking
Kim, H., & Feamster, N. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6461195 · Cited by 1,259
Self-citationDistributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
Bannour, F., Souihi, S., & Mellouk, A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2782482 · Cited by 452
A comprehensive survey on SDN security: threats, mitigations, and future directions
Maleh, Y., Qasmaoui, Y., El Gholami, K., Sadqi, Y., & Mounir, S. (2023) · Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments · doi:10.1007/s40860-022-00171-8 · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Voellmy, A., Kim, H., & Feamster, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Pages
- 43-48
- OpenAlex
- W2124497098
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.82
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Procera: a language for high-level reactive network control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2342441.2342451
- The paper
- Voellmy, A., Kim, H., & Feamster, N. (2012). Procera: a language for high-level reactive network control. Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/2342441.2342451
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.