The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A security enforcement kernel for OpenFlow networks
Open accessAbstract
Software-defined networks facilitate rapid and open innovation at the network control layer by providing a programmable network infrastructure for computing flow policies on demand. However, the dynamism of programmable networks also introduces new security challenges that demand innovative solutions. A critical challenge is efficient detection and reconciliation of potentially conflicting flow rules imposed by dynamic OpenFlow (OF) applications. To that end, we introduce FortNOX, a software extension that provides role-based authorization and security constraint enforcement for the NOX OpenFlow controller. FortNOX enables NOX to check flow rule contradictions in real time, and implements a novel analysis algorithm that is robust even in cases where an adversarial OF application attempts to strategically insert flow rules that would otherwise circumvent flow rules imposed by OF security applications. We demonstrate the utility of FortNOX through a prototype implementation and use it to examine performance and efficiency aspects of the proposed framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consistent updates for software-defined networks: change you can believe in!
Reitblatt, M., Foster, N., Rexford, J., & Walker, D. (2011) · Proceedings of the 10th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks · doi:10.1145/2070562.2070569 · Cited by 163
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
Improving network management with software defined networking
Kim, H., & Feamster, N. (2013) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2013.6461195 · Cited by 1,259
(2013) · doi:10.1145/2342441.2342452 · Cited by 426
A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems
Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862350 · Cited by 402
Ahmad, I., Shahabuddin, S., Kumar, T., Okwuibe, J., Gurtov, A., & Ylianttila, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2916180 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Porras, P., Shin, S., Yegneswaran, V., Fong, M., Tyson, M., & Gu, G.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-13
- Pages
- 121-126
- OpenAlex
- W2137845741
- Cited by
- 529
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 36.36
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A security enforcement kernel for OpenFlow networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2342441.2342466
- The paper
- Porras, P., Shin, S., Yegneswaran, V., Fong, M., Tyson, M., & Gu, G. (2012). A security enforcement kernel for OpenFlow networks. Proceedings of the first workshop on Hot topics in software defined networks. https://doi.org/10.1145/2342441.2342466
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.