The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Crowdsourcing to smartphones: incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing
Abstract
Mobile phone sensing is a new paradigm which takes advantage of the pervasive smartphones to collect and analyze data beyond the scale of what was previously possible. In a mobile phone sensing system, the platform recruits smartphone users to provide sensing service. Existing mobile phone sensing applications and systems lack good incentive mechanisms that can attract more user participation. To address this issue, we design incentive mechanisms for mobile phone sensing. We consider two system models: the platform-centric model where the platform provides a reward shared by participating users, and the user-centric model where users have more control over the payment they will receive. For the platform-centric model, we design an incentive mechanism using a Stackelberg game, where the platform is the leader while the users are the followers. We show how to compute the unique Stackelberg Equilibrium, at which the utility of the platform is maximized, and none of the users can improve its utility by unilaterally deviating from its current strategy. For the user-centric model, we design an auction-based incentive mechanism, which is computationally efficient, individually rational, profitable, and truthful. Through extensive simulations, we evaluate the performance and validate the theoretical properties of our incentive mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload
Cuervo, E., Balasubramanian, A., Cho, D.-K., Wolman, A., Saroiu, S., Chandra, R., & Bahl, P. (2010) · Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Mobile systems, applications, and services · doi:10.1145/1814433.1814441 · Cited by 2,281
Cited by
Mobile Crowd Sensing and Computing: The Review of an Emerging Human-Powered Sensing Paradigm
Guo, B., Wang, Z., Yu, Z., Wang, Y., Yen, N. Y., Huang, R., & Zhou, X. (2015) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2794400 · Cited by 719
A Learning-Based Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning
Zhan, Y., Li, P., Qu, Z., Zeng, D., & Guo, S. (2020) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2967772 · Cited by 602
A Survey on Mobile Crowdsensing Systems: Challenges, Solutions, and Opportunities
Capponi, A., Fiandrino, C., Kantarci, B., Foschini, L., Kliazovich, D., & Bouvry, P. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2914030 · Cited by 594
Crowdbc: a blockchain-based decentralized framework for crowdsourcing
Li, M., Weng, J., Yang, A., Lu, W., Zhang, Y., Hou, L., Liu, J.-N., Xiang, Y., & Deng, R. H. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems · doi:10.1109/tpds.2018.2881735 · Cited by 522
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2582841 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., & Tang, J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2012-08-22
- Pages
- 173-184
- ISSN
- 1543-5679 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1970756365
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 60.84
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crowdsourcing to smartphones: incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2348543.2348567
- The paper
- Yang, D., Xue, G., Fang, X., & Tang, J. (2012). Crowdsourcing to smartphones: incentive mechanism design for mobile phone sensing. Proceedings of the 18th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking. https://doi.org/10.1145/2348543.2348567
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.