Cited by 602Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingBlockchain Technology Applications and Security

A Learning-Based Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning

Zhan, Yufeng, Li, Peng, Qu, Zhihao, Zeng, Deze, Guo, Song·2020·IEEE Internet of Things Journal

Abstract

Internet of Things (IoT) generates large amounts of data at the network edge. Machine learning models are often built on these data, to enable the detection, classification, and prediction of the future events. Due to network bandwidth, storage, and especially privacy concerns, it is often impossible to send all the IoT data to the data center for centralized model training. To address these issues, federated learning has been proposed to let nodes use the local data to train models, which are then aggregated to synthesize a global model. Most of the existing work has focused on designing learning algorithms with provable convergence time, but other issues, such as incentive mechanism, are unexplored. Although incentive mechanisms have been extensively studied in network and computation resource allocation, yet they cannot be applied to federated learning directly due to the unique challenges of information unsharing and difficulties of contribution evaluation. In this article, we study the incentive mechanism for federated learning to motivate edge nodes to contribute model training. Specifically, a deep reinforcement learning-based (DRL) incentive mechanism has been designed to determine the optimal pricing strategy for the parameter server and the optimal training strategies for edge nodes. Finally, numerical experiments have been implemented to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed DRL-based incentive mechanism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jiot.2020.2967772

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhan, Y., Li, P., Qu, Z., Zeng, D., & Guo, S.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • University of Aizu (JP)
  • China University of Geosciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Internet of Things Journal
Published
2020-07
Volume
7
Issue
7
Pages
6360-6368
ISSN
  • 2327-4662 (ISSN-L)
  • 2372-2541
OpenAlex
W3001989995
Cited by
602
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 128 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 31
FWCI
34.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Internet of Things Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • General Research Fund of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (PolyU 152221/19E)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61872310)
  • JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (JP19K20258)
  • Basic Research-Free Exploration Project of Shenzhen (JCYJ20170818103849343)
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M661709)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
Keywords
federated learning, incentive mechanisms, deep reinforcement learning, Internet of Things, edge computing, privacy-preserving training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review