The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A usability study of awareness widgets in a shared workspace groupware system
Abstract
Workspace awareness is knowledge about others' interaction with a shared workspace. Groupware systems provide only limited information about other participants, often compromising workspace awareness. This paper describes a usability study of several widgets designed to help maintain awareness in a groupware workspace. These widgets include a miniature view, a radar view, a multiuser scrollbar, a glance function, and a "what you see is what I do" view. The study examined the widgets' information content, how easily people could interpret them, and whether they were useful or distracting. Observations, questionnaires, and interviews indicate that the miniature and radar displays are useful and valuable for tasks involving spatial manipulation of artifacts. Keywords Workspace awareness, shared workspaces, usability study. INTRODUCTION People maintain an ongoing awareness of others in physical workspaces like whiteboards and tabletops, and they do this using everyday perceptual abilit...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces
Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992) · Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work - CSCW '92 · doi:10.1145/143457.143468 · Cited by 2,550 · cited 6×
“As he says, building systems that support these transitions is important, if difficult, Dourish and Bellotti [4] apply these ideas more specifically to shared workspaces, and define awareness as an understanding of the activities of others, which provides a context for your own activity (p. 107).”
BackgroundInfluentialComputer-supported cooperative work: history and focus
Grudin, J. (1994) · Computer · doi:10.1109/2.291294 · Cited by 1,639
Cited by
Intelligibility and Accountability: Human Considerations in Context-Aware Systems
Bellotti, V., & Edwards, K. (2001) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci16234_05 · Cited by 471
Descriptive theory of awareness for groupware development
Collazos, C. A., Gutiérrez, F. L., Gallardo, J., Ortega, M., Fardoun, H. M., & Molina, A. I. (2019) · Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing · doi:10.1007/s12652-018-1165-9 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Gutwin, C., Roseman, M., & Greenberg, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1996-11-16
- Pages
- 258-267
- OpenAlex
- W2041593403
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.05
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
