Cited by 6Ethics in Business and EducationFlooding and Environmental ImpactInformation Systems Education and Curriculum Development

The pledge of the computing professional: recognizing and promoting ethics in the computing professions

Albrecht, Bill, Christensen, Ken, Dasigi, Venu, Huggins, Jim, Paul, Jody·2012·ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society

Abstract

All of us in the computing community understand the importance of recognizing and promoting ethical behavior in our profession. Instruction in ethics is rapidly becoming a part of most computing-related curricula, whether as a stand-alone course or infused into existing courses. Both Computing Curricula 2005 and the current discussions on Computing Curricula 2013 recognize the significance of ethics, generally considering it a core topic across the various computing disciplines. Additionally, in their criteria for the accreditation of computing programs, ABET specifies that a student must attain by the time of graduation an understanding of ethical issues and responsibilities. What has been missing is a formal rite-of-passage ceremony to prompt student recognition and self-reflection on the transition from being a student to a computing professional. In 2009, seventeen faculty members and industry representatives from a wide range of institutions began to address this open problem by forming The Pledge of the Computing Professional [1], [2]. The Pledge exists to promote and recognize the ethical and moral behavior and responsibilities in graduates of computing-related degree programs as they transition to careers of service to society. The Pledge does not seek to define or enforce ethics --- this is the role of other organizations. Specifically, The Pledge is modeled after the Order of the Engineer [3] and provides a rite-of-passage ceremony at the time of graduation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2422512.2422513

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albrecht, B., Christensen, K., Dasigi, V., Huggins, J., & Paul, J.
Affiliations
  • McNeese State University (US)
  • University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Kettering University (US)
  • Metropolitan State University of Denver (US)
Venue
ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
Published
2012-08
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
6-8
ISSN
0095-2737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047483204
Cited by
6
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society (publishedVersion)
  • Kettering University Digital Commons (Kettering University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Flooding and Environmental Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
Keywords
computer ethics, professional ethics, rites of passage, commencement, computing education, ABET accreditation, student-to-professional transition, ethics education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review