Cited by 239Food Waste Reduction and SustainabilityInnovative Human-Technology InteractionEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design

Ganglbauer, Eva, Fitzpatrick, Geraldine, Comber, Rob·2013·ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Abstract

Ecological sustainability is becoming of increasing concern to the HCI community, though little focus has been given yet to issues around food waste. Given the environmental impact of food waste, there is potential to make a significant difference. To understand everyday domestic practices around food and waste, we took a “practice” lens and carried out a study in 14 households that involved interviews, in-home tours and, in five of the households, a FridgeCam technology probe. The analysis highlights that food waste is the unintended result of multiple moments of consumption dispersed in space and time across other integrated practices such as shopping and cooking, which are themselves embedded in broader contextual factors and values. We highlight the importance of respecting the complex negotiations that people make within given structural conditions and competing values and practices, and suggest design strategies to support dispersed as well as integrated food practices, rather than focusing on waste itself.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2463579.2463582

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A high sense of guilt about throwing away food is expressed by the majority of households.

    “In addition, a high sense of guilt about throwing away food is expressed by the majority of households (Ganglbauer et al., 2013;Grandhi and Appaiah Singh, 2016;Parizeau et al., 2015;Pearson et al., 2016;Qi and Roe, 2016;Quested et al., 2013;Stefan et al., 2013).”
  • There is ample evidence that people are uncomfortable with wasting food due to the perceived value of food itself.

    “Moreover, there is ample evidence that people are uncomfortable with wasting food due to the perceived value of food itself (Ganglbauer et al., 2013;Graham-Rowe et al., 2014;Watson and Meah, 2012).”
  • Ethical considerations regarding a lack of food in other countries have been noted by a number of authors.

    “Ethical considerations regarding a lack of food in other countries have been noted by a number of authors (Blichfeldt et al., 2015;Ganglbauer et al., 2013;Neff et al., 2015;Pearson et al., 2016).”
  • Stockpiling food for unexpected occasions is seen to reduce stress and save time, but could lead to buying more products than one can consume in a timely manner.

    “Stockpiling food for unexpected occasions is seen to reduce stress and save time, but could lead to buying more products than one can consume in a timely manner (Ganglbauer et al., 2013;Graham-Rowe et al., 2014).”
  • Consumers who are busy with work and/or leisure time tend to not look into the fridge prior to shopping, and therefore are more prone to purchase something that is already at home.

    “Furthermore, consumers who are busy with work and/or leisure time, tend to not look into the fridge prior to shopping, and therefore are more prone to purchase something that is already at home (Ganglbauer et al., 2013).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 55 · Cited by 239

Authors
Ganglbauer, E., Fitzpatrick, G., & Comber, R.
Affiliations
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Venue
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2013-05
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
1-25
ISSN
  • 1073-0516 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7325
OpenAlex
W2045657537
Cited by
239
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
FWCI
19.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
food waste, household food practices, environmental sustainability, practice theory, integrated practice, environmental impact of food waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review