The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards network-wide QoE fairness using openflow-assisted adaptive video streaming
Open accessAbstract
Video streaming is an increasingly popular way to consume media content. Adaptive video streaming is an emerging delivery technology which aims to increase user QoE and maximise connection utilisation. Many implementations naively estimate bandwidth from a one-sided client perspective, without taking into account other devices in the network. This behaviour results in unfairness and could potentially lower QoE for all clients. We propose an OpenFlow-assisted QoE Fairness Framework that aims to fairly maximise the QoE of multiple competing clients in a shared network environment. By leveraging a Software Defined Networking technology, such as OpenFlow, we provide a control plane that orchestrates this functionality. The evaluation of our approach in a home networking scenario introduces user-level fairness and network stability, and illustrates the optimisation of QoE across multiple devices in a network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With SAND, bandwidth reservation and bitrate guidance strategies have attracted much attention in the multimedia streaming community [7], [107] [198], [196].”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Some of the approaches, for example in [7,198], employ an optimization function that interacts with the controller to dynamically optimize QoE fairness of multiple competing clients by setting the bitrate for each streaming video in the network.”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKeown (2008) · doi:10.1145/1355734.1355746 · Cited by 8,513
Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement
Wang, Z., Lu, L., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/s0923-5965(03)00076-6 · Cited by 1,024
Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in HTTP-based adaptive video streaming with FESTIVE
Jiang, J., Sekar, V., & Zhang, H. (2012) · ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) · doi:10.1145/2413176.2413189 · Cited by 694
Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement
Dobrian, F., Sekar, V., Awan, A., Stoica, I. G., Joseph, D. A., Ganjam, A., Zhan, J., & Zhang, H. (2011) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/2018436.2018478 · Cited by 674
A tree-search algorithm for mixed integer programming problems
Dakin, R. J. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/8.3.250 · Cited by 641
An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP
Akhshabi, S., Begen, A. C., & Dovrolis, C. (2011) · doi:10.1145/1943552.1943574 · Cited by 616
Bufferbloat: Dark Buffers in the Internet
Gettys, J. (2011) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2011.56 · Cited by 600
Huang, T.-Y., Handigol, N., Heller, B., McKeown, N., & Johari, R. (2012) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/2398776.2398800 · Cited by 344
What happens when HTTP adaptive streaming players compete for bandwidth?
Akhshabi, S., Anantakrishnan, L., Begen, A. C., & Dovrolis, C. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2229087.2229092 · Cited by 343
Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement
Dobrian, F., Sekar, V., Awan, A., Stoica, I. G., Joseph, D. A., Ganjam, A., Zhan, J., & Zhang, H. (2011) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/2043164.2018478 · Cited by 332
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mu M., 2013, LNCS, 302
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hoßfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2360940 · Cited by 844
A Survey on Bitrate Adaptation Schemes for Streaming Media Over HTTP
Bentaleb, A., Taani, B., Begen, A. C., Timmerer, C., & Zimmermann, R. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862938 · Cited by 498
Quality of Service (QoS) in Software Defined Networking (SDN): A survey
Karakuş, M., & Arjan Durresi, A. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.019 · Cited by 416
QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Barakabitze, A. A., Barman, N., Ahmad, A., Zadtootaghaj, S., Sun, L., Martini, M. G., & Atzori, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2958784 · Cited by 239
Wireless Software Defined Networking: A Survey and Taxonomy
Haque, I., & Abu‐Ghazaleh, N. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2571118 · Cited by 218
D-DASH: A Deep Q-Learning Framework for DASH Video Streaming
Gadaleta, M., Chiariotti, F., Rossi, M., & Zanella, A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · doi:10.1109/tccn.2017.2755007 · Cited by 170
SDNDASH: Improving QoE of HTTP Adaptive Streaming Using Software Defined Networking
Bentaleb, A., Begen, A. C., & Zimmermann, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/2964284.2964332 · Cited by 160
SDN: Evolution and Opportunities in the Development IoT Applications
Caraguay, Á. L. V., Peral, A. B., López, L. I. B., & Villalba, L. J. G. (2014) · International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks · doi:10.1155/2014/735142 · Cited by 130
QoE-Driven Rate Adaptation Heuristic for Fair Adaptive Video Streaming
Petrangeli, S., Famaey, J., Claeys, M., Latré, S., & Turck, F. D. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/2818361 · Cited by 121
Adaptive Bitrate Selection: A Survey
Sani, Y., Mauthe, A., & Edwards, C. (2017) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2725241 · Cited by 121
A guide to formulating fairness in an optimization model
Chen, V. X., & Hooker, J. (2023) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-023-05264-y · Cited by 139
QoE-Based Traffic and Resource Management for Adaptive HTTP Video Delivery in LTE
Essaili, A. E., Schroeder, D., Steinbach, E. G., Staehle, D., & Shehada, M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2014.2367355 · Cited by 101
Design and experimental evaluation of network-assisted strategies for HTTP adaptive streaming
Cofano, G., Cicco, L. D., Zinner, T., Nguyen-Ngoc, A., Tran‐Gia, P., & Mascolo, S. (2016) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/2910017.2910597 · Cited by 100
SDNHAS: An SDN-Enabled Architecture to Optimize QoE in HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Bentaleb, A., Begen, A. C., Zimmermann, R., & Harous, S. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2733344 · Cited by 99
Streaming video over HTTP with consistent quality
Li, Z., Begen, A. C., Gahm, J., Shan, Y., Osler, B., & Oran, D. (2014) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/2557642.2557658 · Cited by 88
Delivering stable high-quality video
Kleinrouweler, J. W., Cabrero, S., & Cesar, P. S. (2016) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/2910017.2910599 · Cited by 78
Yadav, P. K., Shafiei, A., & Ooi, W. T. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123390 · Cited by 65
Dynamic Adaptive Video Streaming: Towards a Systematic Comparison of ICN and TCP/IP
Samain, J., Carofiglio, G., Muscariello, L., Papalini, M., Sardara, M., Tortelli, M., & Rossi, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2733340 · Cited by 58
Improving content delivery efficiency through multi-layer mobile edge adaptation
Fajardo, J. O., Taboada, I., & Liberal, F. (2015) · IEEE Network · doi:10.1109/mnet.2015.7340423 · Cited by 53
A Scalable User Fairness Model for Adaptive Video Streaming Over SDN-Assisted Future Networks
Mu, M., Broadbent, M. T. M., Farshad, A., Hart, N., Hutchison, D., Ni, Q., & Race, N. (2016) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2016.2577318 · Cited by 53
Self-citationQoE-SDN APP: A Rate-guided QoE-aware SDN-APP for HTTP Adaptive Video Streaming
Liotou, E., Samdanis, K., Pateromichelakis, E., Passas, N. I., & Merakos, L. F. (2018) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2018.2815421 · Cited by 52
Zinner, T., Jarschel, M., Blenk, A., Wamser, F., & Kellerer, W. (2014) · IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS) · doi:10.1109/noms.2014.6838404 · Cited by 51
Bhattacharyya, R., Bura, A., Rengarajan, D., Rumuly, M., Shakkottai, S., Kalathil, D. M., Mok, R. K. P., & Dhamdhere, A. D. (2019) · ACM International Symposium on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking and Computing (MobiHoc) · doi:10.1145/3323679.3326523 · Cited by 50
Network-layer fairness for adaptive video streams
Mansy, A., Fayed, M. M., & Ammar, M. (2015) · IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) · doi:10.1109/ifipnetworking.2015.7145310 · Cited by 48
Multi-profile ultra high definition (UHD) AVC and HEVC 4K DASH datasets
Quinlan, J. J., & Sreenan, C. J. (2018) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/3204949.3208130 · Cited by 46
Ant colony optimization for QoE-centric flow routing in software-defined networks
Dobrijevic, O., Santl, M., & Matijasevic, M. (2015) · 2015 11th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) · doi:10.1109/cnsm.2015.7367371 · Cited by 44
Performance study of dynamic QoS management for OpenFlow-enabled SDN switches
Durner, R., Blenk, A., & Kellerer, W. (2015) · International Workshop on Quality of Service · doi:10.1109/iwqos.2015.7404730 · Cited by 41
Ongaro, F., Cerqueira, E., Foschini, L., Antonio Corradi, A., & Gerla, M. (2015) · 2012 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · doi:10.1109/iccnc.2015.7069395 · Cited by 39
Georgopoulos, P., Broadbent, M. T. M., Plattner, B., & Race, N. (2014) · International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN) · doi:10.1109/icccn.2014.6911775 · Cited by 39
Self-citationQuality of Experience-Centric Management of Adaptive Video Streaming Services: Status and Challenges
Petrangeli, S., Hooft, J. V. D., Wauters, T., & Turck, F. D. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications · doi:10.1145/3165266 · Cited by 38
Learning-based approach for layered adaptive video streaming over SDN
Uzakgider, T., Cetinkaya, C., & Sayit, M. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.09.027 · Cited by 37
Streaming, Multi-Screens and YouTube
Widdicks, K., Hazas, M., Bates, O., & Friday, A. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300696 · Cited by 40
Bouten, N., Schmidt, R. D. O., Famaey, J., Latré, S., Pras, A., & De Turck, F. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.02.007 · Cited by 36
Traffic Engineering in Software Defined Networks: A Survey
Abbasi, M. R., Guleria, A., & Devi, M. S. (2016) · Journal of Telecommunications and Information Technology · doi:10.26636/jtit.2016.4.757 · Cited by 35
Design and Performance Evaluation of Network-assisted Control Strategies for HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Cofano, G., Cicco, L. D., Zinner, T., Nguyen-Ngoc, A., Tran‐Gia, P., & Mascolo, S. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3092836 · Cited by 34
Compete or Collaborate: Architectures for Collaborative DASH Video Over Future Networks
Bagci, K. T., Sahin, K. E., & Tekalp, A. M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2736638 · Cited by 34
Parsaei, M. R., Mohammadi, R., & Javidan, R. (2017) · European Research in Telemedicine / La Recherche Européenne en Télémédecine · doi:10.1016/j.eurtel.2017.10.003 · Cited by 33
A new QoE fairness index for QoE management
Hoßfeld, T., Skorin‐Kapov, L., Heegaard, P. E., & Varela, M. (2018) · Quality and User Experience · doi:10.1007/s41233-018-0017-x · Cited by 33
SDN for segment based flow routing of DASH
Cetinkaya, C., Karayer, E., Sayit, M., & Hellge, C. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Consumer Electronics Berlin (ICCE-Berlin) · doi:10.1109/icce-berlin.2014.7034284 · Cited by 30
Q-FDBA: improving QoE fairness for video streaming
Jiang, J., Hu, L., Hao, P., Sun, R., Hu, J., & Li, H. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4917-1 · Cited by 31
Performance Characterization of a Commercial Video Streaming Service
Ghasemi, M., Kanuparthy, P., Mansy, A., Benson, T., & Rexford, J. (2016) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/2987443.2987481 · Cited by 29
Using Software Defined Networking to enhance the delivery of Video-on-Demand
Georgopoulos, P., Broadbent, M. T. M., Farshad, A., Plattner, B., & Race, N. (2015) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2015.06.015 · Cited by 29
Self-citationTaha, M., García, L., Jimenez, J. M., & Lloret, J. (2017) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2017.7986416 · Cited by 28
SDN-Enabled Game-Aware Routing for Cloud Gaming Datacenter Network
Amiri, M., Sobhani, A., Osman, H. A., & Shirmohammadi, S. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2752643 · Cited by 28
Leveraging SDN to provide an in-network QoE measurement framework
Farshad, A., Georgopoulos, P., Broadbent, M. T. M., Mu, M., & Race, N. (2015) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2015.7179391 · Cited by 27
Self-citationVideo Quality in 5G Networks: Context-Aware QoE Management in the SDN Control Plane
Awobuluyi, O., Nightingale, J., Wang, Q., & Calero, J. M. A. (2015) · doi:10.1109/cit/iucc/dasc/picom.2015.250 · Cited by 27
A machine learning-based framework for preventing video freezes in HTTP adaptive streaming
Petrangeli, S., Wu, T., Wauters, T., Huysegems, R., Bostoen, T., & Turck, F. D. (2017) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2017.07.009 · Cited by 27
Location-Aware, Context-Driven QoS for IoT Applications
Ahmad, E., Alaslani, M., Dogar, F. R., & Shihada, B. (2019) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2019.2893913 · Cited by 26
A comparative study of DASH representation sets using real user characteristics
Kreuzberger, C., Rainer, B., Hellwagner, H., Toni, L., & Pascal Frossard, B. (2016) · International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV) · doi:10.1145/2910642.2910647 · Cited by 25
Sheikh, M. N. A., Halder, M., Kabir, S. S., Miah, M. W., & Khatun, S. (2019) · Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology · doi:10.34257/gjcstevol19is1pg21 · Cited by 25
Fault tolerance in SDN data plane considering network and application based metrics
Yamansavascilar, B., Baktır, A. C., Özgövde, A., & Ersoy, C. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102780 · Cited by 25
Modeling Stability and Bitrate of Network-Assisted HTTP Adaptive Streaming Players
Kleinrouweler, J. W., Cabrero, S., van der Mei, R., & Cesar, P. S. (2015) · International Teletraffic Congress · doi:10.1109/itc.2015.28 · Cited by 24
Network-based dynamic prioritization of HTTP adaptive streams to avoid video freezes
Petrangeli, S., Wauters, T., Huysegems, R., Bostoen, T., & Turck, F. D. (2015) · IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140475 · Cited by 24
Key Technology for 5G New Radio
Zhang, J. C., Ma, J., Li, G. Y., Kishiyama, Y., Parkvall, S., Liu, G., & Kim, Y.-H. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.8316580 · Cited by 24
Delivery of adaptive bit rate video: balancing fairness, efficiency and quality
Quinlan, J. J., Zahran, A. H., Ramakrishnan, K. K., & Sreenan, C. J. (2015) · IEEE International Symposium on Local and Metropolitan Area Networks (LANMAN) · doi:10.1109/lanman.2015.7114736 · Cited by 23
A real-time video quality estimator for emerging wireless multimedia systems
Aguiar, E. S., Riker, A., Cerqueira, E., Abelém, A., Mu, M., Braun, T. I., Curado, M., & Zeadally, S. (2014) · Wireless Networks · doi:10.1007/s11276-014-0709-y · Cited by 23
Self-citationNo silver bullet: QoE metrics, QoE fairness, and user diversity in the context of QoE management
Hoßfeld, T., Heegaard, P. E., Skorin‐Kapov, L., & Varela, M. (2017) · International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex.2017.7965671 · Cited by 23
Improving Video Quality in Crowded Networks Using a DANE
Kleinrouweler, J. W., Meixner, B., & Cesar, P. S. (2017) · International Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV) · doi:10.1145/3083165.3083167 · Cited by 22
SDN-aware federation of distributed data
Koulouzis, S., Belloum, A. S. Z., Bubak, M., Zhao, Z., Živković, M., & de Laat, C. T. A. M. (2015) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2015.09.032 · Cited by 22
On the efficiency and fairness of multiplayer HTTP-based adaptive video streaming
Yin, X., Bartulović, M., Sekar, V., & Sinopoli, B. (2017) · Proceedings of the ... American Control Conference/Proceedings of the American Control Conference · doi:10.23919/acc.2017.7963606 · Cited by 22
Can context monitoring improve QoE? A case study of video flash crowds in the internet of services
Hoßfeld, T., Skorin-Kapov, L., Haddad, Y., Pocta, P., Siris, V. A., Zgank, A., & Melvin, H. (2015) · 2015 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM) · doi:10.1109/inm.2015.7140480 · Cited by 21
S2VC: An SDN-based framework for maximizing QoE in SVC-based HTTP adaptive streaming
Tashtarian, F., Erfanian, A., & Varasteh, A. (2018) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2018.09.007 · Cited by 20
A Control Architecture for Massive Adaptive Video Streaming Delivery
Cofano, G., Cicco, L. D., & Mascolo, S. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2676652.2676655 · Cited by 19
Quality of Experience (QoE) Studies: Present State and Future Prospect
Yamazaki, T. (2021) · IEICE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1587/transcom.2020cqi0003 · Cited by 18
Quality of Experience-based Routing of Video Traffic for Overlay and ISP Networks
Calvigioni, G., Aparicio-Pardo, R., Sassatelli, L., Leguay, J., Medagliani, P., & Paris, S. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM) · doi:10.1109/infocom.2018.8485954 · Cited by 18
Bentaleb, A., Begen, A. C., & Zimmermann, R. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3219752 · Cited by 18
Learning-Based Joint QoE Optimization for Adaptive Video Streaming Based on Smart Edge
Ma, X., Li, Q., Jiang, Y., Muntean, G., & Zou, L. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2022.3145619 · Cited by 17
Client-Driven Network-level QoE fairness for Encrypted 'DASH-S'
Chen, J., Ammar, M., Fayed, M. M., & Fonseca, R. (2016) · doi:10.1145/2940136.2940144 · Cited by 17
SEBRA: SAND-enabled bitrate and resource allocation algorithm for network-assisted video streaming
Khorov, E., Krasilov, A., Liubogoshchev, M., & Tang, S. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob) · doi:10.1109/wimob.2017.8115758 · Cited by 17
ENHANCING QUALITY OF SERVICE IN SOFTWARE-DEFINED NETWORKS
Antonio Corradi, A., Gerla, M., Cerqueira, E., & Ongaro, F. (2014) · Cited by 17
ELBA: Efficient Layer Based Routing Algorithm in SDN
Gangwal, A., Gupta, M., Gaur, M. S., Laxmi, V., & Conti, M. (2016) · 2016 25th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN) · doi:10.1109/icccn.2016.7568515 · Cited by 16
Zahran, A. H., Quinlan, J. J., Ramakrishnan, K. K., & Sreenan, C. J. (2017) · ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys) · doi:10.1145/3083187.3083199 · Cited by 16
An SDN-assisted System Design for Improving performance of SVC-DASH
Çetinkaya, C., Ozveren, Y., & Sayit, M. F. (2015) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2015f333 · Cited by 16
A network monitor and controller using only OpenFlow
dos Santos, R. B., Ribeiro, T. R., & César, C. D. A. C. (2015) · Latin American Network Operations and Management Symposium · doi:10.1109/lanoms.2015.7332663 · Cited by 16
Dynamic Resource Allocation by Batch Optimization for Value-Added Video Services Over SDN
Bagci, K. T., & Tekalp, A. M. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2018.2823907 · Cited by 16
Enhancing QoE Based on Machine Learning and DASH in SDN Networks
Abar, T., Letaïfa, A. B., & Asmi, S. E. (2018) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) · doi:10.1109/waina.2018.00095 · Cited by 16
QFlow: A Learning Approach to High QoE Video Streaming at the Wireless Edge
Bhattacharyya, R., Bura, A., Rengarajan, D., Rumuly, M., Xia, B., Shakkottai, S., Kalathil, D. M., Mok, R. K. P., & Dhamdhere, A. D. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2021.3106675 · Cited by 16
Alsader, M., Barakabitze, A. A., & Mkwawa, I.-H. M. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3597058 · Cited by 21
A Systematic Literature Review on Software-Defined Networking
Alsmadi, I. M., Alazzam, I., & Akour, M. (2016) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44257-0_14 · Cited by 15
SDN Based Architecture to Improve Video Streaming in Home Networks
Abuteir, R. M., Fladenmuller, A., & Fourmaux, O. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA) · doi:10.1109/aina.2016.58 · Cited by 15
Objective and subjective measurement QoE in SDN networks
Abar, T., Letaïfa, A. B., & Asmi, S. E. (2017) · International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference (IWCMC) · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2017.7986489 · Cited by 15
OpenE2EQoS: Meter-based method for end-to-end QoS of multimedia services over SDN
Lin, T.-N., Hsu, Y.-M., Sheng-Yi, K., & Chi, P.-W. (2016) · IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2016.7794972 · Cited by 14
SAND/3: SDN-Assisted Novel QoE Control Method for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP/3
Guillen, L., Izumi, S., Abe, T., & Suganuma, T. (2019) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics8080864 · Cited by 14
FlowQoS: Per-Flow Quality of Service for Broadband Access Networks
Seddiki, M. S., Shahbaz, M., Donovan, S. P., Grover, S., Park, M., Feamster, N., & Song, Y. (2015) · SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) · Cited by 14
Software‐defined network‐based prioritization to avoid video freezes in HTTP adaptive streaming
Petrangeli, S., Wauters, T., Huysegems, R., Bostoen, T., & Turck, F. D. (2016) · International Journal of Network Management · doi:10.1002/nem.1931 · Cited by 13
Bagci, K. T., Sahin, K. E., & Tekalp, A. M. (2016) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2016.7532612 · Cited by 13
Akpınar, K., & Hua, K. A. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3379983 · Cited by 13
Road to Salvation: Streaming Clients and Content Delivery Networks Working Together
Begen, A. C., Bentaleb, A., Silhavy, D., Pham, S., Zimmermann, R., & Law, W. (2021) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.121.2100137 · Cited by 13
QoE Inference and Improvement Without End-Host Control
Nikravesh, A., Chen, Q. A., Haseley, S., Zhu, X., Challen, G. W., & Mao, Z. M. (2018) · IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC) · doi:10.1109/sec.2018.00011 · Cited by 13
Quality of Experience in ICN: Keep Your Low- Bitrate Close and High-Bitrate Closer
Li, W., Oteafy, S., Fayed, M. M., & Hassanein, H. S. (2020) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking · doi:10.1109/tnet.2020.3044995 · Cited by 13
QoE Management for Future Networks
Schatz, R., Schwarzmann, S., Zinner, T., Dobrijević, O., Liotou, E., Počta, P., Baraković, S., Husić, J. B., & Skorin‐Kapov, L. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90415-3_3 · Cited by 13
Framework for optimized multimedia routing over software defined networks
Caraguay, Á. L. V., Fernández, J. A. P., & Villalba, L. J. G. (2015) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2015.09.013 · Cited by 12
Optimal QoE-Fair Resource Allocation in Multipath Video Delivery Network
Manfredi, G., Cicco, L. D., & Mascolo, S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2022.3162750 · Cited by 11
Lu, Z., Ramakrishnan, S., & Zhu, X. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2017.2772802 · Cited by 11
Implementation of SAND Architecture Using SDN
Kalan, R. S., Sayit, M. F., & Begen, A. C. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks (NFV-SDN) · doi:10.1109/nfv-sdn.2018.8725632 · Cited by 11
Zinner, T., Wamser, F., Leopold, H., Dobre, C., Mavromoustakis, C. X., & García, N. M. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805195-5.00005-3 · Cited by 11
Providing Multimedia QoS Methods over Software Defined Networks: A Comprehensive Review
Parsaei, M. R., Javidan, R., Fatemifar, A., & Einavipour, S. (2017) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2017914549 · Cited by 11
Quality of Experience Inference for Video Services in Home WiFi Networks
Ligata, A., Perenda, E., & Gacanin, H. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1700712 · Cited by 11
Multimedia Delivery Techniques over Software-Defined Networks: A Survey
Sanaei, M., & Mostafavi, S. (2019) · International Conference on Web Research (ICWR) · doi:10.1109/icwr.2019.8765278 · Cited by 11
On QoE-Oriented Cloud Service Orchestration for Application Providers
Chemodanov, D., Calyam, P. P., Valluripally, S., Trinh, H., Patman, J., & Palaniappan, K. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Services Computing · doi:10.1109/tsc.2018.2866851 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Georgopoulos, P., Elkhatib, Y., Broadbent, M., Mu, M., & Race, N.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Future human-centric multimedia networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-08-16
- Pages
- 15-20
- OpenAlex
- W2146232773
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (258365, 318343)
- Natural Environment Research Council
- FP7 Information and Communication Technologies
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Keywords
- adaptive video streaming, OpenFlow, software-defined networking, bandwidth estimation, home network, control plane, network stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
