The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards network-wide QoE fairness using openflow-assisted adaptive video streaming
Open accessAbstract
Video streaming is an increasingly popular way to consume media content. Adaptive video streaming is an emerging delivery technology which aims to increase user QoE and maximise connection utilisation. Many implementations naively estimate bandwidth from a one-sided client perspective, without taking into account other devices in the network. This behaviour results in unfairness and could potentially lower QoE for all clients. We propose an OpenFlow-assisted QoE Fairness Framework that aims to fairly maximise the QoE of multiple competing clients in a shared network environment. By leveraging a Software Defined Networking technology, such as OpenFlow, we provide a control plane that orchestrates this functionality. The evaluation of our approach in a home networking scenario introduces user-level fairness and network stability, and illustrates the optimisation of QoE across multiple devices in a network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“With SAND, bandwidth reservation and bitrate guidance strategies have attracted much attention in the multimedia streaming community [7], [107] [198], [196].”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“Some of the approaches, for example in [7,198], employ an optimization function that interacts with the controller to dynamically optimize QoE fairness of multiple competing clients by setting the bitrate for each streaming video in the network.”
From QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey (2020) · cites this paper as [7]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McKeown (2008) · doi:10.1145/1355734.1355746 · Cited by 8,513
Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement
Wang, Z., Lu, L., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/s0923-5965(03)00076-6 · Cited by 1,024
Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in HTTP-based adaptive video streaming with FESTIVE
Jiang, J., Sekar, V., & Zhang, H. (2012) · ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) · doi:10.1145/2413176.2413189 · Cited by 694
Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement
Dobrian, F., Sekar, V., Awan, A., Stoica, I. G., Joseph, D. A., Ganjam, A., Zhan, J., & Zhang, H. (2011) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/2018436.2018478 · Cited by 674
A tree-search algorithm for mixed integer programming problems
Dakin, R. J. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/8.3.250 · Cited by 641
An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptation algorithms in adaptive streaming over HTTP
Akhshabi, S., Begen, A. C., & Dovrolis, C. (2011) · doi:10.1145/1943552.1943574 · Cited by 616
Bufferbloat: Dark Buffers in the Internet
Gettys, J. (2011) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2011.56 · Cited by 600
Huang, T.-Y., Handigol, N., Heller, B., McKeown, N., & Johari, R. (2012) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/2398776.2398800 · Cited by 344
What happens when HTTP adaptive streaming players compete for bandwidth?
Akhshabi, S., Anantakrishnan, L., Begen, A. C., & Dovrolis, C. (2012) · doi:10.1145/2229087.2229092 · Cited by 343
Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement
Dobrian, F., Sekar, V., Awan, A., Stoica, I. G., Joseph, D. A., Ganjam, A., Zhan, J., & Zhang, H. (2011) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/2043164.2018478 · Cited by 332
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mu M., 2013, LNCS, 302
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming
Seufert, M., Egger, S., Slanina, M., Zinner, T., Hoßfeld, T., & Tran-Gia, P. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2360940 · Cited by 844
A Survey on Bitrate Adaptation Schemes for Streaming Media Over HTTP
Bentaleb, A., Taani, B., Begen, A. C., Timmerer, C., & Zimmermann, R. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862938 · Cited by 498
Quality of Service (QoS) in Software Defined Networking (SDN): A survey
Karakuş, M., & Arjan Durresi, A. (2016) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.12.019 · Cited by 416
QoE Management of Multimedia Streaming Services in Future Networks: A Tutorial and Survey
Barakabitze, A. A., Barman, N., Ahmad, A., Zadtootaghaj, S., Sun, L., Martini, M. G., & Atzori, L. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2958784 · Cited by 239
Wireless Software Defined Networking: A Survey and Taxonomy
Haque, I., & Abu‐Ghazaleh, N. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2571118 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Georgopoulos, P., Elkhatib, Y., Broadbent, M., Mu, M., & Race, N.
- Affiliations
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2013 ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Future human-centric multimedia networking
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-08-16
- Pages
- 15-20
- OpenAlex
- W2146232773
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 20.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (258365, 318343)
- Natural Environment Research Council
- FP7 Information and Communication Technologies
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
- Keywords
- adaptive video streaming, OpenFlow, software-defined networking, bandwidth estimation, home network, control plane, network stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
