The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation
Abstract
Mobile networks enable users to post on social media services (e.g., Twitter) from anywhere. The activities of mobile users involve three major entities: user, post, and location. The interaction of these entities is the key to answer questions such as who will post a message where and on what topic? In this paper, we address the problem of profiling mobile users by modeling their activities, i.e., we explore topic modeling considering the spatial and textual aspects of user posts, and predict future user locations. We propose the first ST (Spatial Topic) model to capture the correlation between users' movements and between user interests and the function of locations. We employ the sparse coding technique which greatly speeds up the learning process. We perform experiments on two real life data sets from Twitter and Yelp. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed model consistently improves the average [email protected],5,10,15,20 for location recommendation by at least 50% (Twitter) and 300% (Yelp) against existing state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms and geographical topic models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning Graph-based POI Embedding for Location-based Recommendation
Xie, M., Yin, H., Wang, H., Xu, F., Chen, W., & Wang, S. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/2983323.2983711 · Cited by 391
Zhang, J.-D., & Chow, C.-Y. (2015) · Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/2766462.2767711 · Cited by 288
LORE: exploiting sequential influence for location recommendations
Zhang, J.-D., Chow, C.-Y., & Li, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2666310.2666400 · Cited by 254
Tweet-mapping Method for Tourist Spots Based on Now-Tweets and Spot-photos
Oku, K., Hattori, F., & Kawagoe, K. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.202 · Cited by 17
Log2Intent: Towards Interpretable User Modeling via Recurrent Semantics Memory Unit
Tao, Z., Li, S., Wang, Z., Fang, C., Yang, L., Zhao, H., & Fu, Y. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330889 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, B., & Ester, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2013-10-12
- Pages
- 25-32
- OpenAlex
- W2082260230
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2507157.2507174
- The paper
- Hu, B., & Ester, M. (2013). Spatial topic modeling in online social media for location recommendation. Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2507157.2507174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.