Cited by 36Green IT and SustainabilityInnovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface Design

How carat affects user behavior: implications for mobile battery awareness applications

Athukorala, Kumaripaba, Lagerspetz, Eemil, von Kügelgen, Maria, Jylhä, Antti, Oliner, Adam J., Tarkoma, Sasu, Jacucci, Giulio·2014·Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Mobile devices have limited battery life, and numerous battery management applications are available that aim to improve it. This paper examines a large-scale mobile battery awareness application, called Carat, to see how it changes user behavior with long-term use. We conducted a survey of current Carat Android users and analyzed their interaction logs. The results show that long-term Carat users save more battery, charge their devices less often, learn to manage their battery with less help from Carat, have a better understanding of how Carat works, and may enjoy competing against other users. Based on these findings, we propose a set of guidelines for mobile battery awareness applications: battery awareness applications should make the reasoning behind their recommendations understandable to the user, be tailored to retain long-term users, take the audience into account when formulating feedback, and distinguish third-party and system applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2556288.2557271

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Athukorala, K., Lagerspetz, E., von Kügelgen, M., Jylhä, A., Oliner, A. J., Tarkoma, S., & Jacucci, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-04-26
Pages
1029-1038
OpenAlex
W2100822595
Cited by
36
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
8.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
CARAT, user behavior, battery life, battery management, user feedback, Android

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review