Cited by 880Environmental Education and SustainabilityEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesBehavioral Health and Interventions

The effect of tailored information, goal setting, and tailored feedback on household energy use, energy-related behaviors, and behavioral antecedents

Open access
Abrahamse, Wokje, Steg, Linda, Vlek, Charles, Rothengatter, Talib·2007·Journal of Environmental Psychology

Abstract

In this multidisciplinary study, an Internet-based tool was used to encourage households ( N =189) to reduce their direct (gas, electricity and fuel) and indirect energy use (embedded in the production, transportation and disposal of consumer goods). A combination of tailored information, goal setting (5%), and tailored feedback was used. The purpose of this study was to examine whether this combination of interventions would result in (i) changes in direct and indirect energy use, (ii) changes in energy-related behaviors, and (iii) changes in behavioral antecedents (i.e. knowledge). After 5 months, households exposed to the combination of interventions saved 5.1%, while households in the control group used 0.7% more energy. Households exposed to the interventions saved significantly more direct energy than households in the control group did. No difference in indirect energy savings emerged. Households exposed to the interventions adopted a number of energy-saving behaviors during the course of the study, whereas households in the control group did so to a lesser extent. Households exposed to the interventions had significantly higher knowledge levels of energy conservation than the control group had. It is argued that if the aim is to effectively encourage household energy conservation, it is necessary to examine changes in energy use, energy-related behaviors and behavioral antecedents.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.08.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Rothengatter, T.
Affiliations
University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Abrahamse, Wokje
Venue
Journal of Environmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
265-276
ISSN
0272-4944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129525767
Cited by
880
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 97 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 62 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 48
FWCI
57.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
residential energy conservation, tailored information, goal setting, personalized feedback, energy-saving behavior, behavioral antecedents, energy knowledge, energy consumption reduction, online intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review