The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology investment and business performance
Open accessAbstract
The article focuses on relationship between measures of information technology (IT) investment and facets of corporate business performance. The results of the authors's study suggest that IT investments have begun to show results in proving they can make a positive contribution to firm output and labor productivity. However, there is a need to improve the modeling and measurement of the performance effects of aggregate IT investments. The Authors' study suggests that measures of IT investment have differential effects on the various measures of corporate business performance. A research strategy for modeling IT effects on firm output performance and labor productivity needs to be different from a research strategy for modeling IT effects on management effectiveness and strategic business performance. Another significant issue is how IT's effects should be measured. Organizations measure value of IT investments to a very limited extent in terms of minimal benchmarks of time and cost schedules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Cited by
RAVICHANDRAN, T., LERTWONGSATIEN, C., & LERTWONGSATIEN, C. (2005) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2005.11045820 · Cited by 1,238
Chae, H.-C., Koh, C. E., & Prybutok, V. R. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.14 · Cited by 461
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420
Kim, T. G., Lee, J. H., & Law, R. (2008) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2007.05.016 · Cited by 369
Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Johnson, J. L. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.03 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Rai, A., Patnayakuni, R., & Patnayakuni, N.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 89-97
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2111156986
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
