The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CatchSync: catching synchronized behavior in large directed graphs
Abstract
Given a directed graph of millions of nodes, how can we automatically spot anomalous, suspicious nodes, judging only from their connectivity patterns? Suspicious graph patterns show up in many applications, from Twitter users who buy fake followers, manipulating the social network, to botnet members performing distributed denial of service attacks, disturbing the network traffic graph. We propose a fast and effective method, CatchSync, which exploits two of the tell-tale signs left in graphs by fraudsters: (a) synchronized behavior: suspicious nodes have extremely similar behavior pattern, because they are often required to perform some task together (such as follow the same user); and (b) rare behavior: their connectivity patterns are very different from the majority. We introduce novel measures to quantify both concepts ("synchronicity" and "normality") and we propose a parameter-free algorithm that works on the resulting synchronicity-normality plots. Thanks to careful design, CatchSync has the following desirable properties: (a) it is scalable to large datasets, being linear on the graph size; (b) it is parameter free; and (c) it is side-information-oblivious: it can operate using only the topology, without needing labeled data, nor timing information, etc., while still capable of using side information, if available. We applied CatchSync on two large, real datasets 1-billion-edge Twitter social graph and 3-billion-edge Tencent Weibo social graph, and several synthetic ones; CatchSync consistently outperforms existing competitors, both in detection accuracy by 36% on Twitter and 20% on Tencent Weibo, as well as in speed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, we highlight that our work can complement other methods used in prior work to detect fake and compromised accounts, such as using unsupervised anomaly detection techniques [50], temporal features [23, 24], IP addresses [45], as well as generic supervised learning [3].”
From Measuring, Characterizing, and Detecting Facebook Like Farms (2017) · cites this paper as [23]
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1541880.1541882 · Cited by 11,687
Fortunato, S. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002 · Cited by 11,293
Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment
Kleinberg, J. M. (1999) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/324133.324140 · Cited by 9,032
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
On power-law relationships of the Internet topology
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999) · ACM SIGCOMM Conference (SIGCOMM) · doi:10.1145/316188.316229 · Cited by 4,279
Self-citationBroder, A., Kumar, R., Maghoul, F., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Stata, R., Tomkins, A., & Wiener, J. (2000) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(00)00083-9 · Cited by 2,810
On power-law relationships of the Internet topology
Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999) · ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review · doi:10.1145/316194.316229 · Cited by 2,643
Self-citationOutlier detection for high dimensional data
Aggarwal, C. C., & Yu, P. S. (2001) · ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) · doi:10.1145/375663.375668 · Cited by 1,066
The average distances in random graphs with given expected degrees
Chung, F., & Lü, L. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.252631999 · Cited by 891
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collective Opinion Spam Detection: Bridging Review Networks and Metadata
Rayana, S., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783370 · Cited by 604
Fraud detection: A systematic literature review of graph-based anomaly detection approaches
Pourhabibi, T., Ong, K., Kam, B., & Boo, Y. L. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113303 · Cited by 518
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159729 · Cited by 381
Self-citationFRAUDAR: Bounding Graph Fraud in the Face of Camouflage
Hooi, B., Song, H. A., Beutel, A., Shah, N., Shin, K., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939747 · Cited by 305
Self-citationVosoughi, S., Mohsenvand, M. ‘., & Roy, D. K. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3070644 · Cited by 202
One-Class Adversarial Nets for Fraud Detection
Zheng, P., Yuan, S., Wu, X., Li, J., & Lu, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33011286 · Cited by 173
Suspicious Behavior Detection: Current Trends and Future Directions
Jiang, M., Cui, P., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2016.5 · Cited by 132
Self-citationDiscovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints
Ye, J., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23528-8_17 · Cited by 107
Effective and Efficient Community Search Over Large Directed Graphs
Fang, Y., Wang, Z., Cheng, R. C. K., Wang, H., & Hu, J. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2872982 · Cited by 100
Detection of malicious social bots: A survey and a refined taxonomy
Latah, M. (2020) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113383 · Cited by 94
Wang, B., Gong, N. Z., & Fu, H. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.56 · Cited by 92
A General Suspiciousness Metric for Dense Blocks in Multimodal Data
Jiang, M., Beutel, A., Cui, P., Hooi, B., Yang, S., & Faloutsos, C. (2015) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2015.61 · Cited by 91
Self-citationCatching Synchronized Behaviors in Large Networks: A Graph Mining Approach
Jiang, M., Cui, P., Beutel, A., Faloutsos, C., & Yang, S. (2016) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/2746403 · Cited by 88
Self-citationDiscovering Opinion Spammer Groups by Network Footprints
Ye, J., & Akoglu, L. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Conference on Online Social Networks · doi:10.1145/2817946.2820606 · Cited by 84
Graph-Based Fraud Detection in the Face of Camouflage
Hooi, B., Shin, K., Song, H. A., Beutel, A., Shah, N., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3056563 · Cited by 84
Self-citationM-Zoom: Fast Dense-Block Detection in Tensors with Quality Guarantees
Shin, K., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46128-1_17 · Cited by 82
Self-citationLiu, S., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3132847.3133018 · Cited by 75
Self-citationError-Bounded Graph Anomaly Loss for GNNs
Zhao, T., Deng, C., Yu, K., Jiang, T., Wang, D., & Jiang, M. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411979 · Cited by 69
Self-citationShin, K., Hooi, B., Kim, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098087 · Cited by 65
Self-citationEdgeCentric: Anomaly Detection in Edge-Attributed Networks
Shah, N., Beutel, A., Hooi, B., Akoglu, L., Günnemann, S., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2016.0053 · Cited by 62
Self-citationShin, K., Hooi, B., Kim, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3018661.3018676 · Cited by 58
Self-citationMining Fraudsters and Fraudulent Strategies in Large-Scale Mobile Social Networks
Yang, Y., Xu, Y., Sun, Y., Dong, Y., Wu, F. Q., & Zhuang, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2019.2924431 · Cited by 56
Discovering social spammers from multiple views
Shen, H., Ma, F., Zhang, X., Zong, L., Liu, X., & Liang, W. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.11.013 · Cited by 55
Clickstream User Behavior Models
Wang, G., Zhang, X., Tang, S., Wilson, C., Zheng, H.-T., & Zhao, B. Y. (2017) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3068332 · Cited by 56
A Synergistic Approach for Graph Anomaly Detection With Pattern Mining and Feature Learning
Zhao, T., Jiang, T., Shah, N., & Jiang, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3102609 · Cited by 51
Self-citationCrowdTarget: Target-based Detection of Crowdturfing in Online Social Networks
Song, J., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2015) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security · doi:10.1145/2810103.2813661 · Cited by 50
Taha, K., & Yoo, P. D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2015.2510826 · Cited by 46
Spotting Suspicious Behaviors in Multimodal Data: A General Metric and Algorithms
Jiang, M., Beutel, A., Cui, P., Hooi, B., Yang, S., & Faloutsos, C. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2016.2555310 · Cited by 47
Self-citationFollow spam detection based on cascaded social information
Jeong, S., Noh, G., Oh, H., & Kim, C.-K. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.07.033 · Cited by 45
Online Social Deception and Its Countermeasures: A Survey
Guo, Z. Y., Cho, J.-H., Chen, I.-R., Sengupta, S., Hong, M., & Mitra, T. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.3047337 · Cited by 49
EnsemFDet: An Ensemble Approach to Fraud Detection based on Bipartite Graph
Ren, Y., Zhu, H., Zhang, J., Dai, P., & Bo, L. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00197 · Cited by 45
Inferring lockstep behavior from connectivity pattern in large graphs
Jiang, M., Cui, P., Beutel, A., Faloutsos, C., & Yang, S. (2016) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-015-0883-y · Cited by 43
Self-citationImpact of reviewer social interaction on online consumer review fraud detection
Goswami, K., Park, Y., & Song, C. (2017) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-017-0075-6 · Cited by 42
Online Social Network Analysis: A Survey of Research Applications in Computer SciencePreprint
Kurka, D. B., Godoy, A., & Zuben, F. J. V. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.05655 · Cited by 51
Covert Botnet Command and Control Using Twitter
Pantic, N., & Husain, M. (2015) · Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/2818000.2818047 · Cited by 39
Fast, Accurate and Provable Triangle Counting in Fully Dynamic Graph Streams
Shin, K., Oh, S., Kim, J., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3375392 · Cited by 37
Self-citationA Contrast Metric for Fraud Detection in Rich Graphs
Liu, S., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2018.2876531 · Cited by 36
Self-citationND-Sync: Detecting Synchronized Fraud Activities
Γιάτσογλου, Μ., Chatzakou, D., Shah, N., Beutel, A., Faloutsos, C., & Vakali, A. I. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18032-8_16 · Cited by 36
Self-citationSpectrum-based Deep Neural Networks for Fraud Detection
Yuan, S., Wu, X., Li, J., & Lu, A. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3132847.3133139 · Cited by 34
SC-Com: Spotting Collusive Community in Opinion Spam Detection
Byun, H., Jeong, S., & Kim, C.-K. (2021) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102593 · Cited by 34
Shah, N., Lamba, H., Beutel, A., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.140 · Cited by 32
Self-citationAntisocial Behavior on the Web
Kumar, S., Cheng, J., & Leskovec, J. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3041021.3051106 · Cited by 36
Cao, B., Mao, M., Viidu, S., & Yu, P. S. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.90 · Cited by 30
Characterizing Social Bots Spreading Financial Disinformation
Tardelli, S., Avvenuti, M., Tesconi, M., & Cresci, S. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_26 · Cited by 29
Measuring, Characterizing, and Detecting Facebook Like Farms
Ikram, M., Onwuzurike, L., Farooqi, S., Cristofaro, E. D., Friedman, A., Jourjon, G., Kaafar, M. A., & Shafiq, M. Z. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security · doi:10.1145/3121134 · Cited by 27
“Finally, we highlight that our work can complement other methods used in prior work to detect fake and compromised accounts, such as using unsupervised anomaly detection techniques [50], temporal features [23, 24], IP addresses [45], as well as generic supervised learning [3].”
MethodNo Place to Hide: Catching Fraudulent Entities in Tensors
Ban, Y., Xin, L., Ling, H., Duan, Y., Liu, X., & Xu, W. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313403 · Cited by 25
Detecting and Analyzing Collusive Entities on YouTube
Dutta, H. S., Jobanputra, M., Negi, H., & Chakraborty, T. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3477300 · Cited by 25
Fast, Accurate, and Flexible Algorithms for Dense Subtensor Mining
Shin, K., Hooi, B., & Faloutsos, C. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data · doi:10.1145/3154414 · Cited by 24
Self-citationSliceNDice: Mining Suspicious Multi-Attribute Entity Groups with Multi-View Graphs
Nilforoshan, H., & Shah, N. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa.2019.00050 · Cited by 24
Shah, N. (2017) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052617 · Cited by 23
Spotting anomalous ratings for rating systems by analyzing target users and items
Yang, Z., Cai, Z., & Yang, Y. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.052 · Cited by 23
A postmortem of suspended Twitter accounts in the 2016 U.S. presidential election
Le, H., Boynton, G. R., Shafiq, Z., & Srinivasan, P. (2019) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) · doi:10.1145/3341161.3342878 · Cited by 23
Understanding Incentivized Mobile App Installs on Google Play Store
Farooqi, S., Feal, Á., Lauinger, T., McCoy, D., Shafiq, Z., & Vallina-Rodriguez, N. (2020) · Proceedings of the ACM Internet Measurement Conference · doi:10.1145/3419394.3423662 · Cited by 22
Graph-Based User Behavior Modeling
Beutel, A., Akoglu, L., & Faloutsos, C. (2015) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2783258.2789985 · Cited by 21
Self-citationUncovering anomalous rating behaviors for rating systems
Yang, Z., Sun, Q., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, B. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.001 · Cited by 21
Index-based Structural Clustering on Directed Graphs
Meng, L., Yuan, L., Chen, Z., Lin, X., & Yang, S. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde53745.2022.00257 · Cited by 21
Self-citationMeasuring and mitigating oauth access token abuse by collusion networks
Farooqi, S., Zaffar, F., Leontiadis, N., & Shafiq, Z. (2017) · ACM Internet Measurement Conference (IMC) · doi:10.1145/3131365.3131404 · Cited by 22
CubeFlow: Money Laundering Detection with Coupled Tensors
Sun, X., Zhang, J., Zhao, Q., Liu, S., Chen, J., Zhuang, R., Shen, H., & Cheng, X. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75762-5_7 · Cited by 20
Uncovering Suspicious Activity From Partially Paired and Incomplete Multimodal Data
Chiu, C., Zhan, J., & Zhan, F. (2017) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2726078 · Cited by 18
Reliable Recommendation with Review-level Explanations
Lyu, Y., Yin, H., Liu, J., Liu, M., Liu, H., & Deng, S. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00137 · Cited by 17
Identifying similar-bicliques in bipartite graphs
Yao, K. L., Chang, L., & Yu, J. X. (2022) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3551793.3551854 · Cited by 17
Analyzing and Detecting Collusive Users Involved in Blackmarket Retweeting Activities
Arora, U., Dutta, H. S., Joshi, B., Chetan, A., & Chakraborty, T. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3380537 · Cited by 17
Sybil Detection in Social-Activity Networks: Modeling, Algorithms and Evaluations
Zhang, X., Xie, H. L., & Lui, J. C. S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP) · doi:10.1109/icnp.2018.00015 · Cited by 17
A time evolving online social network generation algorithm
Shirzadian, P., Antony, B., Gattani, A. G., Tasnina, N., & Heath, L. S. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-29443-w · Cited by 16
Detecting cooperative and organized spammer groups in micro-blogging community
Dang, Q., Zhou, Y., Gao, F., & Sun, Q. (2016) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-016-0479-5 · Cited by 16
Gupta, S. K., Kumaraguru, P., & Chakraborty, T. (2019) · Joint International Conference on Data Science & Management of Data (CODS-COMAD) · doi:10.1145/3297001.3297009 · Cited by 16
Pay me and i'll follow you: detection of crowdturfing following activities in microblog environment
Liu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, M., & Ma, S. (2016) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 16
FairJudge: Trustworthy User Prediction in Rating PlatformsPreprint
Kumar, S., Hooi, B., Makhija, D., Kumar, M., Faloutsos, C., & Subrahamanian, V. S. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.10545 · Cited by 16
Self-citationTruss-Based Community Search over Streaming Directed Graphs
Liao, X., Liu, Q., Huang, X., & Xu, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3659437.3659440 · Cited by 15
Large-scale Fake Click Detection for E-commerce Recommendation Systems
Li, J., Li, Z., Huang, J., Zhang, J., Wang, X., Lu, X., & Zhou, J. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde51399.2021.00290 · Cited by 15
Enhancing Sybil Detection via Social-Activity Networks: A Random Walk Approach
Zhang, X., Xie, H. L., Yi, P., & Lui, J. C. S. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3151701 · Cited by 15
Distance-based customer detection in fake follower markets
Jang, B., Jeong, S., & Kim, C.-K. (2018) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2018.12.001 · Cited by 15
SybilHP: Sybil Detection in Directed Social Networks with Adaptive Homophily Prediction
Lu, H., Gong, D., Li, Z., Liu, F., & Liu, F. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13095341 · Cited by 13
EDoG: Adversarial Edge Detection For Graph Neural Networks
Xu, X., Wang, H., Lal, A., Gunter, C. A., & Li, B. (2023) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml54575.2023.00027 · Cited by 13
Exploratory Analysis of Graph Data by Leveraging Domain Knowledge
Jin, D., & Koutra, D. (2017) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm.2017.28 · Cited by 13
Liu, R., Liu, R., Pugliese, A., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3397463 · Cited by 13
Taha, K. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2996595 · Cited by 14
Kumar, S., Jiang, M., Jung, T., Luo, R. J., & Leskovec, J. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3160597 · Cited by 12
Self-citationOnline Fake Review Identification based on Decision Rules
Institutions, I. T. B. S. &. E., Sanjay, K. S., & Danti, A. (2019) · International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering · doi:10.30534/ijatcse/2019/07822019 · Cited by 12
Outlier edge detection using random graph generation models and applications
Zhang, H., Serkan Kiranyaz, B., & Gabbouj, M. (2017) · Journal Of Big Data · doi:10.1186/s40537-017-0073-8 · Cited by 12
FraudVis: Understanding Unsupervised Fraud Detection Algorithms
Sun, J., Zhu, Q., Liu, Z., Liu, X., Lee, J., Su, Z., Shi, L., Huang, L., & Xu, W. (2018) · IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium · doi:10.1109/pacificvis.2018.00029 · Cited by 11
DenseAlert: Incremental Dense-Subtensor Detection in Tensor StreamsPreprint
Shin, K., Hooi, B., Kim, J., & Faloutsos, C. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03374 · Cited by 11
Self-citationMondal, J., & Deshpande, A. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Distributed and Event-Based Systems (DEBS) · doi:10.1145/2933267.2933316 · Cited by 10
Bahri, L., Carminati, B., & Ferrari, E. (2016) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3014338 · Cited by 10
MRFS: Mining Rating Fraud Subgraph in Bipartite Graph for Users and Products
Yu, W., Wang, W., Xu, G., Wu, H., Li, H., Wang, J., Li, X., & Liu, J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems · doi:10.1109/tcss.2022.3233821 · Cited by 9
Understanding Underground Incentivized Review Services
Oak, R., & Shafiq, Z. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642342 · Cited by 8
Actionable Objective Optimization for Suspicious Behavior Detection on Large Bipartite Graphs
Zhao, T., Malir, M., & Jiang, M. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8621975 · Cited by 8
Self-citationKnowledge‐based approaches for identity management in online social networks
Bahri, L., Carminati, B., & Ferrari, E. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1260 · Cited by 8
Cultural coalitions detection approach using GPU based on hybrid Bat and Cultural Algorithms
Kechid, A., & Drias, H. (2020) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106368 · Cited by 7
PERSEUS-HUB: Interactive and Collective Exploration of Large-Scale Graphs
Jin, D., Leventidis, A. S., Shen, H., Zhang, R., Wu, J., & Koutra, D. (2017) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics4030022 · Cited by 7
Temporal Neighbor Sequence-based Interpretable Spammer Groups Detection on E-commerce platform
Li, N., Ji, S., Dou, Y., Chiu, D. K. W., Zhang, Q., Liang, Y., & Wei, Y. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104177 · Cited by 6
Recommending Inferior Results: A General and Feature-Free Model for Spam Detection
Liu, Y. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3340531.3411900 · Cited by 7
Signed Latent Factors for Spamming Activity Detection
Liu, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2024.3516573 · Cited by 6
EagleMine: Vision-guided Micro-clusters recognition and collective anomaly detection
Feng, W., Liu, S., Faloutsos, C., Hooi, B., Shen, H., & Cheng, X. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.033 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDECIFE: Detecting Collusive Users Involved in Blackmarket Following Services on Twitter
Dutta, H. S., Aggarwal, K., & Chakraborty, T. (2021) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3465336.3475108 · Cited by 6
The Social Relation Key: A new paradigm for security
Jeong, S., Lee, J., Park, J., & Kim, C.-K. (2017) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2017.07.003 · Cited by 6
Measurement and Early Detection of Third-Party Application Abuse on Twitter
Farooqi, S., & Shafiq, Z. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313515 · Cited by 7
Stream Querying and Reasoning on Social Data
Mondal, J., & Deshpande, A. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_391-1 · Cited by 6
Rating behavior evaluation and abnormality forensics analysis for injection attack detection
Yang, Z., Sun, Q., Liu, Z., Yan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-021-00689-y · Cited by 5
Detecting Anomalous Ratings in Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems
Yang, Z., & Cai, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics · doi:10.4018/ijdcf.2016040102 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, M., Cui, P., Beutel, A., Faloutsos, C., & Yang, S.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-08-24
- Pages
- 941-950
- OpenAlex
- W2101447063
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14
- FWCI
- 19.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-1314632)
- Army Research Office (W911NF-11-C-0088)
- U.S. Army Research Laboratory (W911NF-09-2-0053)
- Media Development Authority - Singapore (WBS:R-252-300-001-490)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61210008, 61303075, 61370022)
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (W911NF-11-C-0088)
- Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (2013DFG12870, 2011CB302206)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- directed graphs, synchronicity, normality, connectivity patterns, bot detection, fake followers, parameter-free algorithms, Weibo, large-scale graphs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
