The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Designing user incentives for cybersecurity
Open accessAbstract
How to encourage better user security practices and behavior
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Test bed creation is recommended in the cited source.
“Test bed creation is also recommended in [2].”
From Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
The Main Text recommends changing software offerings based on users’ patching rights. It mentions testing and staging patches, but does not recommend creating a test bed; searches for test-bed creation and an experimental platform found no such recommendation. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Economics of Information Security
Anderson, R., & Moore, T. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1130992 · Cited by 859
Moore, D., Shannon, C., & claffy, K. (2002) · ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop (IMW) · doi:10.1145/637201.637244 · Cited by 785
Network Software Security and User Incentives
August, T., & Tunca, T. I. (2006) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0568 · Cited by 141
Self-citationDepartment of Defense Strategy for Operating in Cyberspace
(2011) · doi:10.21236/ada545385 · Cited by 86
August, T., & Tunca, T. I. (2011) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.1100.1304 · Cited by 82
Self-citationTwo views on security software liability. Let the legal system decide
Ryan, D. J., & Heckman, C. (2003) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2003.1176999 · Cited by 30
Two views on security software liability: Using the right legal tools
Heckman, C. (2003) · IEEE Security & Privacy · doi:10.1109/msecp.2003.1203443 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Obama B. Executive Order---Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. The White House Office of the Press Secretary Washington D.C. 2013. Obama B. Executive Order---Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. The White House Office of the Press Secretary Washington D.C. 2013.
- Satter R. ACLU: Slow smartphone updates are privacy threat. Associated Press (2013). Satter R. ACLU: Slow smartphone updates are privacy threat. Associated Press (2013).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing and augmenting SCADA cyber security: A survey of techniques
Nazir, S., Patel, S., & Patel, D. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.06.010 · Cited by 167
“Similarly lack of user incentives [34] to apply patching enabled Code Red, a malware to infect 360,000 servers, although a security patch had been released earlier.”
Economics of ransomware: Risk interdependence and large-scale attacks
August, T., Dao, D., & Niculescu, M. F. (2022) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2022.4300 · Cited by 37
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- August, T., August, R., & Shin, H.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Our Lady of the Lake University (US)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2014-10-27
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 43-46
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2165675413
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- escholarship.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Division of Computer and Network Systems (CNS-0954234)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- user incentives, cybersecurity, user security behavior, security practices, behavioral incentives
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
