The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cross-modal Retrieval with Correspondence Autoencoder
Abstract
The problem of cross-modal retrieval, e.g., using a text query to search for images and vice-versa, is considered in this paper. A novel model involving correspondence autoencoder (Corr-AE) is proposed here for solving this problem. The model is constructed by correlating hidden representations of two uni-modal autoencoders. A novel optimal objective, which minimizes a linear combination of representation learning errors for each modality and correlation learning error between hidden representations of two modalities, is used to train the model as a whole. Minimization of correlation learning error forces the model to learn hidden representations with only common information in different modalities, while minimization of representation learning error makes hidden representations are good enough to reconstruct input of each modality. A parameter $\alpha$ is used to balance the representation learning error and the correlation learning error. Based on two different multi-modal autoencoders, Corr-AE is extended to other two correspondence models, here we called Corr-Cross-AE and Corr-Full-AE. The proposed models are evaluated on three publicly available data sets from real scenes. We demonstrate that the three correspondence autoencoders perform significantly better than three canonical correlation analysis based models and two popular multi-modal deep models on cross-modal retrieval tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets
Hinton, G. E., Osindero, S., & Teh, Y.-W. (2006) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · Cited by 16,336
Training Products of Experts by Minimizing Contrastive Divergence
Hinton, G. E. (2002) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976602760128018 · Cited by 4,879 · cited 1×
“All the models can be effi-ciently learned by using the contrastive divergence approximation (CD) [12].”
Background
Cited by
Multimodal Machine Learning: A Survey and Taxonomy
Baltrusaitis, T., Ahuja, C., & Morency, L.-P. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2798607 · Cited by 5,018
A survey of deep neural network architectures and their applications
Liu, W., Wang, Z., Liu, X., Zeng, N., Liu, Y., & Alsaadi, F. E. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2016.12.038 · Cited by 3,239
Adversarial Cross-Modal Retrieval
Wang, B., Yang, Y., Xu, X., Hanjalic, A., & Shen, H. T. (2017) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123326 · Cited by 779
Deep Multimodal Representation Learning: A Survey
Guo, W., Wang, J., & Wang, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2916887 · Cited by 535
Deep Supervised Cross-Modal Retrieval
Zhen, L., Hu, P., Wang, X., & Peng, D. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.01064 · Cited by 478
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feng, F., Wang, X., & Li, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-11-03
- Pages
- 7-16
- OpenAlex
- W1964073652
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.74
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross-modal Retrieval with Correspondence Autoencoder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2647868.2654902
- The paper
- Feng, F., Wang, X., & Li, R. (2014). Cross-modal Retrieval with Correspondence Autoencoder. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1145/2647868.2654902
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.