The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rosemary: A Robust, Secure, and High-performance Network Operating System
Abstract
Within the hierarchy of the Software Defined Network (SDN) network stack, the control layer operates as the critical middleware facilitator of interactions between the data plane and the network applications, which govern flow routing decisions. In the OpenFlow implementation of the SDN model, the control layer, commonly referred to as a network operating system (NOS), has been realized by a range of competing implementations that offer various performance and functionality advantages: Floodlight, POX, NOX, and ONIX. In this paper we focus on the question of control layer resilience, when rapidly developed prototype network applications go awry, or third-party network applications incorporate unexpected vulnerabilities, fatal instabilities, or even malicious logic. We demonstrate how simple and common failures in a network application may lead to loss of the control layer, and in effect, loss of network control. To address these concerns we present the ROSEMARY controller, which implements a network application containment and resilience strategy based around the notion of spawning applications independently within a micro-NOS. ROSEMARY distinguishes itself by its blend of process containment, resource utilization monitoring, and an application permission structure, all designed to prevent common failures of network applications from halting operation of the SDN Stack. We present our design and implementation of ROSEMARY, along with an extensive evaluation of its performance relative to several of the mostly well-known and widely used controllers. Rather than imposing significant performance costs, we find that with the integration of two optimization features, ROSEMARY offers a competitive performance advantage over the majority of other controllers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exokernel: an operating system architecture for application-level resource management
Engler, D. R., Kaashoek, M. F., & O'Toole, J. (1995) · Proceedings of the fifteenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles - SOSP '95 · doi:10.1145/224056.224076 · Cited by 1,118
Cited by
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
A survey on security challenges in cloud computing: issues, threats, and solutions
Tabrizchi, H., & Kuchaki Rafsanjani, M. (2020) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-020-03213-1 · Cited by 538
Distributed SDN Control: Survey, Taxonomy, and Challenges
Bannour, F., Souihi, S., & Mellouk, A. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2017.2782482 · Cited by 452
Ahmad, I., Shahabuddin, S., Kumar, T., Okwuibe, J., Gurtov, A., & Ylianttila, M. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2916180 · Cited by 366
Security in SDN: A comprehensive survey
Correa Chica, J. C., Imbachi, J. C., & Botero Vega, J. F. (2020) · Journal of Network and Computer Applications · doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102595 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Shin, S., Song, Y., Lee, T., Lee, S., Chung, J., Porras, P., Yegneswaran, V., Noh, J., & Kang, B. B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-11-03
- Pages
- 78-89
- OpenAlex
- W2122109510
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.59
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rosemary: A Robust, Secure, and High-performance Network Operating System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2660267.2660353
- The paper
- Shin, S., Song, Y., Lee, T., Lee, S., Chung, J., Porras, P., Yegneswaran, V., Noh, J., & Kang, B. B. (2014). Rosemary: A Robust, Secure, and High-performance Network Operating System. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2660267.2660353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.