Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MoSh: motion and shape capture from sparse markers

Open access
Loper, Matthew, Mahmood, Naureen, Black, Michael J.·2014·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

Marker-based motion capture (mocap) is widely criticized as producing lifeless animations. We argue that important information about body surface motion is present in standard marker sets but is lost in extracting a skeleton. We demonstrate a new approach called MoSh (Motion and Shape capture), that automatically extracts this detail from mocap data. MoSh estimates body shape and pose together using sparse marker data by exploiting a parametric model of the human body. In contrast to previous work, MoSh solves for the marker locations relative to the body and estimates accurate body shape directly from the markers without the use of 3D scans; this effectively turns a mocap system into an approximate body scanner. MoSh is able to capture soft tissue motions directly from markers by allowing body shape to vary over time. We evaluate the effect of different marker sets on pose and shape accuracy and propose a new sparse marker set for capturing soft-tissue motion. We illustrate MoSh by recovering body shape, pose, and soft-tissue motion from archival mocap data and using this to produce animations with subtlety and realism. We also show soft-tissue motion retargeting to new characters and show how to magnify the 3D deformations of soft tissue to create animations with appealing exaggerations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2661229.2661273

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. de Aguiar E., Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1--8.
  2. 10.5555/1455489 · doi:10.5555/1455489
  3. 10.5555/1338439.1338550 · doi:10.5555/1338439.1338550
  4. 10.1109/TVCG.2013.80 · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.80
  5. Nocedal J. and Wright S. J. 2006. Numerical Optimization 2nd ed. Springer New York. Nocedal J. and Wright S. J. 2006. Numerical Optimization 2nd ed. Springer New York.

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Loper, M., Mahmood, N., & Black, M. J.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
33
Issue
6
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W2122633688
Cited by
344
References
26
FWCI
16.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Funders
National Science Foundation (EIA-0196217)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MoSh: motion and shape capture from sparse markers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2661229.2661273
The paper
Loper, M., Mahmood, N., & Black, M. J. (2014). MoSh: motion and shape capture from sparse markers. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/2661229.2661273

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.