Cited by 30Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesUsability and User Interface DesignTactile and Sensory Interactions

From screen reading to aural glancing: towards instant access to key page sections

Gadde, Prathik, Bolchini, Davide·2014·Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility - ASSETS '14

Abstract

Whereas glancing at a web page is crucial for navigation, screen readers force users to listen to content serially. This hampers efficient browsing of complex pages and maintains an accessibility divide between sighted and screen-reader users. To address this problem, we adopt a three-pronged strategy: (1) in a user study, we identified key page-level navigation problems that screen-reader users face while browsing a complex site; (2) through a crowd-sourcing system, we prioritized the most relevant sections of different page types necessary to support basic tasks; (3) we introduced DASX, a navigation approach that augments the ability of screen-reader users to "aurally glance" at a complex page by accessing at any time the most relevant page sections. In a preliminary evaluation, DASX markedly reduced the gap in page navigation efficiency between screen-reader and sighted users. Our contribution provides the groundwork for rethinking access strategies that strongly tie aural navigation to user's tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2661334.2661363

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gadde, P., & Bolchini, D.
Affiliations
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 16th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers & accessibility - ASSETS '14
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2014
Pages
67-74
OpenAlex
W1994862647
Cited by
30
References
16
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS) (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
screen readers, web accessibility, page navigation, user study, crowdsourcing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review