Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 668

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Matter of Heartbleed

Open access
Durumeric, Zakir, Li, Frank, Kasten, James, Amann, Johanna, Beekman, Jethro, Payer, Mathias, Weaver, Nicolas, Adrian, David, Paxson, Vern, Bailey, Michael, Halderman, J. Alex·2014·Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference

Abstract

The Heartbleed vulnerability took the Internet by surprise in April 2014. The vulnerability, one of the most consequential since the advent of the commercial Internet, allowed attackers to remotely read protected memory from an estimated 24--55% of popular HTTPS sites. In this work, we perform a comprehensive, measurement-based analysis of the vulnerability's impact, including (1) tracking the vulnerable population, (2) monitoring patching behavior over time, (3) assessing the impact on the HTTPS certificate ecosystem, and (4) exposing real attacks that attempted to exploit the bug. Furthermore, we conduct a large-scale vulnerability notification experiment involving 150,000 hosts and observe a nearly 50% increase in patching by notified hosts. Drawing upon these analyses, we discuss what went well and what went poorly, in an effort to understand how the technical community can respond more effectively to such events in the future.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2663716.2663755

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. The Heartbleed Hit List : The Passwords You Need to Change Right Now , Apr. 2014 . http://mashable.com/2014/04/09/heartbleed-bug-websites-affected/. The Heartbleed Hit List: The Passwords You Need to Change Right Now, Apr. 2014. http://mashable.com/2014/04/09/heartbleed-bug-websites-affected/.
  2. Bitcoin. OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability , Apr. 2014 . https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2014-04--11-heartbleed. Bitcoin. OpenSSL Heartbleed Vulnerability, Apr. 2014. https://bitcoin.org/en/alert/2014-04--11-heartbleed.
  3. L. Grangeia . Heartbleed , Cupid and Wireless , May 2014 . http://www.sysvalue.com/en/heartbleed-cupid-wireless/. L. Grangeia. Heartbleed, Cupid and Wireless, May 2014. http://www.sysvalue.com/en/heartbleed-cupid-wireless/.
  4. S. Grant . The Bleeding Hearts Club: Heartbleed Recovery for System Administrators , Apr. 2014 . https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/bleeding-hearts-club-heartbleed-recovery-system-administrators. S. Grant. The Bleeding Hearts Club: Heartbleed Recovery for System Administrators, Apr. 2014. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/04/bleeding-hearts-club-heartbleed-recovery-system-administrators.
  5. B. Grubb . Heartbleed Disclosure Timeline: Who Knew What and When . Apr. 2014 . http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/security-it/heartbleed-disclosure-timeline-who-knew-what-and-when-20140415-zqurk.html. B. Grubb. Heartbleed Disclosure Timeline: Who Knew What and When. Apr. 2014. http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/security-it/heartbleed-disclosure-timeline-who-knew-what-and-when-20140415-zqurk.html.
  6. M. Masnick . Shameful Security: StartCom Charges People To Revoke SSL Certs Vulnerable to Heartbleed , Apr. 2014 . http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140409/11442426859/shameful-security-startcom-charges-people-to-revoke-ssl-certs-vulnerable-to-heartbleed.shtml. M. Masnick. Shameful Security: StartCom Charges People To Revoke SSL Certs Vulnerable to Heartbleed, Apr. 2014. http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140409/11442426859/shameful-security-startcom-charges-people-to-revoke-ssl-certs-vulnerable-to-heartbleed.shtml.
  7. E. Ng . Tunnel Fails after OpenSSL Patch , Apr. 2014 . https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2014-April/022934.html. E. Ng. Tunnel Fails after OpenSSL Patch, Apr. 2014. https://lists.openswan.org/pipermail/users/2014-April/022934.html.
  8. P. Ondruska . Does OpenSSL CVE-2014-0160 Effect Jetty Users ', Apr. 2014 . http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jetty-users/msg04624.html. P. Ondruska. Does OpenSSL CVE-2014-0160 Effect Jetty Users', Apr. 2014. http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/jetty-users/msg04624.html.

Cited by

See all 668

Metadata

Authors
Durumeric, Z., Li, F., Kasten, J., Amann, J., Beekman, J., Payer, M., Weaver, N., Adrian, D., Paxson, V., Bailey, M., & Halderman, J. A.
Venue
Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-11-05
Pages
475-488
OpenAlex
W2112736324
Cited by
668
References
4
FWCI
54.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Matter of Heartbleed. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2663716.2663755
The paper
Durumeric, Z., Li, F., Kasten, J., Amann, J., Beekman, J., Payer, M., Weaver, N., Adrian, D., Paxson, V., Bailey, M., & Halderman, J. A. (2014). The Matter of Heartbleed. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. https://doi.org/10.1145/2663716.2663755

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.