Cited by 911Data Quality and ManagementBig Data and Business IntelligenceKnowledge Management and Technology

A product perspective on total data quality management

Open access
Wang, Richard Y.·1998·Communications of the ACM

Abstract

To increase productivity, organizations must manage information as they manage products. The field of information quality (IQ) has experienced significant advances during its relatively brief history. Today, researchers and practitioners alike have moved beyond establishing information quality as an important field to resolving IQ problems ranging from IQ definition, measurement, analysis, and improvement to tools, methods, and processes. However, theoretically-grounded methodologies for Total Data Quality Management (TDQM) are still lacking. Based on cumulated research efforts, this article presents such a methodology for addressing these problems. The purpose of this TDQM methodology is to deliver high quality information products to information consumers. It aims to facilitate the implementation of an organization's overall data quality policy formally expressed by top management. Organizations of the 21st century must harness the full potential of their data in order to gain competitive advantage and attain strategic goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/269012.269022

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cambridge Research Group. Information Quality Survey: Administrator's Guide. Cambridge Research Group, Cambridge, MA, 1997.
  2. Firth, C.P. and Wang, R.Y. Data Quality Systems: Evaluation and Imple- mentation. Cambridge Market Intelligence Ltd., London, 1996.
  3. Wang, R.Y. and Lee, Y.W. Integrity Analyzer: A Software Tool for Total Data Quality Management. Cambridge Research Group, Cambridge, MA, 1998.
  4. Richard Y. Wang (rwang@mit.edu), a leading authority in data quality research and practice, is Co-Director of the Total Data Quality Management Program at Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Research has been supported in part by MIT's Total Data Quality Management (TDQM) Research Program, Cambridge Research Group, and Naval Command, Control, and Ocean Surveillance Center's (NCCOSC) contract # NM66001-91-D-0103.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, R. Y.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Richard Y.
Venue
Communications of the ACM
Published
1998-02
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
58-65
ISSN
  • 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7317
OpenAlex
W2000237244
Cited by
911
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 42
FWCI
21.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias y Tecnologia Felix Morales Bueno (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Data Quality and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Knowledge Management and Technology
Keywords
information quality, information products, data quality measurement, data quality improvement, information consumers, competitive advantage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review