The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative Accessibility: How Blind and Sighted Companions Co-Create Accessible Home Spaces
Abstract
In recent decades, great technological strides have been made toward enabling people who are blind to live independent, successful lives. However, there has been relatively little progress towards understanding the social, collaborative needs of this population, particularly in the domestic setting. We conducted semi-structured interviews in the homes of 10 pairs of close companions in which one partner was blind and one was not. We found that partners engaged in collaborative accessibility by taking active roles in co-creating an accessible environment. Due to their different visual abilities, however, partners sometimes encountered difficulties managing divergent needs and engaging in shared experiences. We describe outstanding challenges to creating accessible shared home spaces and outline new research and technology opportunities for supporting collaborative accessibility in the home.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This framework was first proposed by [53] and has since been applied extensively as a model for analyzing institutional readiness and adoption of technological innovations [47-49, 54, 55, 56].”
From Toward universal access to information: an analysis of digital accessibility policy readiness in U.S. public universities (2026) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
(2006) · Cited by 18,730
Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis
Brink, E., Dellve, L., Hallberg, U. E., Abrahamsson, K. H., Klingberg, G., & Wentz, K. (2006) · International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being · doi:10.3402/qhw.v1i3.4932 · Cited by 6,913
Predictors of Assistive Technology Abandonment
Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. J. (1993) · Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/10400435.1993.10132205 · Cited by 1,049
The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook
Sears, A., & Jacko, J. A. (2007) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781410615862 · Cited by 745
Wobbrock, J. O., Kane, S. K., Gajos, K. Z., Harada, S., & Froehlich, J. E. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing · doi:10.1145/1952383.1952384 · Cited by 643
Self-citationShneiderman, B. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332833.332843 · Cited by 622
VizWiz: nearly real-time answers to visual questions
Bigham, J. P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A., Miller, R. C., Miller, R., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., White, S., et al. (2010) · Proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology · doi:10.1145/1866029.1866080 · Cited by 601
Bigham, J. P., Jayant, C., Ji, H., Little, G., Miller, A. E., Miller, R. C., Tatarowicz, A., White, B., White, S., & YEH, T. P. (2010) · International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A) · doi:10.1145/1805986.1806020 · Cited by 536
In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions
Shinohara, K., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2011) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979044 · Cited by 495
Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology
Mankoff, J., Hayes, G. R., & Kasnitz, D. (2010) · Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility · doi:10.1145/1878803.1878807 · Cited by 406
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.5555/1241889.1241896 · DOI
- Erickson , W. , Lee , C. , von Schrader , S. ( 2013 ). Disability statistics from the 2011 American Community Survey (ACS) . Ithaca, NY : Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI) . Erickson, W., Lee, C., von Schrader, S. (2013). Disability statistics from the 2011 American Community Survey (ACS). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Employment and Disability Institute (EDI).
- Kaye , J. ( 2012 ). Love , Ritual & Videochat . in R. Harper, Ed. The Connected Home : The Future of Domestic Life, Springer . Kaye, J. (2012). Love, Ritual & Videochat. in R. Harper, Ed. The Connected Home: The Future of Domestic Life, Springer.
- Neustaedter , C. , Harrison , S. , Sellen , A. , eds. ( 2012 ). Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life . London : Springer . Neustaedter, C., Harrison, S., Sellen, A., eds. (2012). Connecting families: The impact of new communication technologies on domestic life. London: Springer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design
Bennett, C. L., Brady, E., & Branham, S. M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3234695.3236348 · Cited by 493
Self-citationBranham, S. M., & Kane, S. K. (2015) · Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility - ASSETS '15 · doi:10.1145/2700648.2809864 · Cited by 169
Self-citationEnabling Collaboration in Learning Computer Programing Inclusive of Children with Vision Impairments
Thieme, A., Morrison, C. P., Villar, N., Grayson, M., & Lindley, S. E. (2017) · Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3064663.3064689 · Cited by 153
Das, M., Tang, J., Ringland, K. E., & Piper, A. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449282 · Cited by 142
Facade: Auto-generating Tactile Interfaces to Appliances
Guo, A., Kim, J., Chen, X. '., Yeh, T., Hudson, S. E., Mankoff, J., & Bigham, J. P. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025845 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Branham, S. M., & Kane, S. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-04-18
- Pages
- 2373-2382
- OpenAlex
- W2078091234
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 22.21
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IIS-1353312)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- blindness, blind people, assistive technology, independent living
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
