Cited by 144Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and Representation

Towards Accessible Remote Work: Understanding Work-from-Home Practices of Neurodivergent Professionals

Das, Maitraye, Tang, John, Ringland, Kathryn E., Piper, Anne Marie·2021·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Working from home has become a mainstream work practice in many organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic. While remote work has received much scholarly and public attention over the years, we still know little about how people with disabilities engage in remote work from their homes and what access means in this context. To understand and rethink accessibility in remote work, the present paper studies work-from-home practices of neurodivergent professionals who have Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, learning disabilities (e.g., dyslexia) and psychosocial disabilities (e.g., anxiety, depression). We report on interviews with 36 US-based neurodivergent professionals who have been working from home during the pandemic. Our findings reveal that while working from home, neurodivergent professionals create accessible physical and digital workspaces, negotiate accessible communication practices, and reconcile tensions between productivity and wellbeing. Our analysis reconsiders what access means in remote work for neurodivergent professionals and offers practical insights for inclusive work practices and accessibility improvements in remote collaboration tools.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3449282

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Das, M., Tang, J., Ringland, K. E., & Piper, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2021-04-13
Volume
5
Issue
CSCW1
Pages
1-30
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128311906
Cited by
142
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 4
FWCI
36.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (IIS-1901456)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
remote work, accessibility, neurodivergence, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, learning disabilities, dyslexia, psychosocial disability, working from home, COVID-19 pandemic, communication accessibility, remote collaboration tools, digital workspaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review