Cited by 34Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyFace Recognition and PerceptionInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

When my face is the interface: an experimental comparison of interacting with one's own face or someone else's face

Nass, Clifford, Kim, Eun-Young, Lee, Eun-Ju·1998·Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '98

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/274644.274667

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nass, C., Kim, E.-Y., & Lee, E.-J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '98
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
1998
Pages
148-154
OpenAlex
W2065943221
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.68
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
face, interfaces, embodiment, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review