The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks
Open accessAbstract
A major challenge in indexing unstructured hypertext databases is to automatically extract meta-data that enables structured search using topic taxonomies, circumvents keyword ambiguity, and improves the quality of search and profile-based routing and filtering. Therefore, an accurate classifier is an essential component of a hypertext database. Hyperlinks pose new problems not addressed in the extensive text classification literature. Links clearly contain high-quality semantic clues that are lost upon a purely term-based classifier, but exploiting link information is non-trivial because it is noisy. Naive use of terms in the link neighborhood of a document can even degrade accuracy. Our contribution is to propose robust statistical models and a relaxation labeling technique for better classification by exploiting link information in a small neighborhood around documents. Our technique also adapts gracefully to the fraction of neighboring documents having known topics. We experimented with pre-classified samples from Yahoo!1 and the US Patent Database2. In previous work, we developed a text classifier that misclassified only 13% of the documents in the well-known Reuters benchmark; this was comparable to the best results ever obtained. This classifier misclassified 36% of the patents, indicating that classifying hypertext can be more difficult than classifying text. Naively using terms in neighboring documents increased error to 38%; our hypertext classifier reduced it to 21%. Results with the Yahoo! sample were more dramatic: the text classifier showed 68% error, whereas our hypertext classifier reduced this to only 21%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification And Regression Trees
Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (2017) · doi:10.1201/9781315139470 · Cited by 11,417
Learning Logical Definitions from Relations
Quinlan, J. R. (1990) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1022699322624 · Cited by 1,644
Cited by
Data mining: concepts and techniques
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-3305 · Cited by 28,531
Collective Classification in Network Data
Sen, P., Namata, G., Bilgic, M., Getoor, L., Gallagher, B., & Eliassi‐Rad, T. (2008) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v29i3.2157 · Cited by 3,293
Richardson, M., & Domingos, P. (2006) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-006-5833-1 · Cited by 2,676
SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity
Jeh, G., & Widom, J. (2002) · Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/775047.775126 · Cited by 1,925
Relational learning via latent social dimensions
Tang, L., & Liu, H. (2009) · Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1557019.1557109 · Cited by 799
Metadata
- Authors
- Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., & Indyk, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-06
- Pages
- 307-318
- ISSN
- 0730-8078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076008912
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/276304.276332
- The paper
- Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., & Indyk, P. (1998). Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data. https://doi.org/10.1145/276304.276332
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.