The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
Abstract
It is my great pleasure to welcome you to Santiago de Chile, my hometown, and to the 38th International SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, the premier annual forum for presentations of research in information retrieval (IR) and related topics. This six-day event has a broad technical program that we hope you find interesting, useful, and insightful. Amazingly, SIGIR 2015 is not only held in my hometown, but also where I did my high school studies. Could I ever imagine that? No way! So in this venue where I have plenty of mixed memories, we start the conference on Sunday with eight great tutorials, thanks to Yoelle Maarek; the Doctoral Consortium, organized by J. Shane Culpepper and Brian Davidson; and we finish the day with the opening reception in the central patio. The next three days we have the core of the conference, highlighted with the keynotes by Nick Belkin, (Salton Award) on how we interact with information, and ChengXiang Zhai on game theory applied to IR. We also have 70 technical papers selected by the program committee chaired by Mounia Lalmas, Alistair Moffat and Berthier Ribeiro-Neto. Thanks for your great and hard work! We also have 79 short papers and 12 demos presented in a special session before the banquet on Tuesday that will be held at a nearby palace on Cerro Santa Lucía. Thanks to Maarten de Rijke, Ee-Peng Lim and Ryen White for handling the short papers and Djoerd Hiemstra and Mirella Moro for arranging the demonstrations. On Wednesday we also have the industry track, SIRIP, organized by Hang Li and Jaime Teevan. This track combines eight invited talks and four refereed papers. This day we have been able to keep the number of parallel tracks to just three, and also have the final panel on industry impact from academia, as a single track event. Finally, on Thursday we have seven interesting workshops, thanks to the committee chaired by Fernando Diaz and Diane Kelly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 · Cited by 2,377
ABCDM: An Attention-based Bidirectional CNN-RNN Deep Model for sentiment analysis
Basiri, M. E., Nemati, S., Abdar, M., Cambria, E., & Acharya, U. R. (2021) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.08.005 · Cited by 745
Miglani, A., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100184 · Cited by 295
A/B testing: A systematic literature review
Quin, F., Weyns, D., Galster, M., & Silva, C. C. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112011 · Cited by 83
FAST2: An intelligent assistant for finding relevant papers
Yu, Z., & Menzies, T. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.11.021 · Cited by 80
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2766462
- The paper
- Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
