Cited by 1,902Complexity and Algorithms in GraphsAdvanced Graph Theory ResearchConstraint Satisfaction and Optimization

Some optimal inapproximability results

Håstad, Johan·2001·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

We prove optimal, up to an arbitrary ε > 0, inapproximability results for Max-E k -Sat for k ≥ 3, maximizing the number of satisfied linear equations in an over-determined system of linear equations modulo a prime p and Set Splitting. As a consequence of these results we get improved lower bounds for the efficient approximability of many optimization problems studied previously. In particular, for Max-E2-Sat, Max-Cut, Max-di-Cut, and Vertex cover.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/502090.502098

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maxk XOR problems are NP-hard for k ≥ 2.

    “We remark that these problems belong to the complexity class NP-hard for k ≥ 2 [14].”
  • It is NP-hard to achieve an approximation ratio of r* ≥ 16/17 ≈ 0.9412 for Max-Cut on all graphs.

    “It has been shown that it is NP-hard to achieve an approximation ratio of r ∗ ≥ 16 / 17 ≈ 0 . 9412 for Max-Cut on all graphs (Håstad, 2001).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as Håstad, 2001

  • No classical polynomial-time approximation algorithm can guarantee to find a solution within 2^k/(2^k + ε) of the optimum for Max k-SAT, for any fixed ε > 0.

    “Max k-SAT is N P -hard for k ≥ 2, and no classical polynomialtime approximation algorithm can guarantee to find a solution that is within 2 k -foot_0 2 k + ϵ of the optimum [28] (for any arbitrary but fixed ϵ > 0); note that the decision version of 2-SAT can be solved classically polynomially.”

    From High-Round QAOA for MAX $k$-SAT on Trapped Ion NISQ Devices (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Håstad, J.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Håstad, Johan
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
2001-07
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
798-859
ISSN
  • 0004-5411
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W1564025554
Cited by
1,902
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 95
FWCI
34.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of the ACM (publishedVersion)
  • Electronic colloquium on computational complexity
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Keywords
hardness of approximation, MaxCut, vertex cover, approximation lower bounds, overdetermined systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review