Cited by 46Online Learning and AnalyticsInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsOnline and Blended Learning

Exploring the relation between self-regulation, online activities, and academic performance: a case study

Pardo, Abelardo, Han, Feifei, Ellis, Robert A.·2016·Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16

Abstract

The areas of educational data mining and learning analytics focus on the extraction of knowledge and actionable items from data sets containing detailed information about students. However, the potential impact from these techniques is increased when properly contextualized within a learning environment. More studies are needed to explore the connection between student interactions, approaches to learning, and academic performance. Self-regulated learning (SRL) is defined as the extent to which a student is able to motivationally, metacognitively, and cognitively engage in a learning experience. SRL has been the focus of research in traditional classroom learning and is also argued to play a vital role in the online or blended learning contexts. In this paper, we study how SRL affects students' online interactions with various learning activities and its influence in academic performance. The results derived from a naturalistic experiment among a cohort of first year engineering students showed that positive self-regulated strategies (PSRS) and negative self-regulated strategies (NSRS) affected both the interaction with online activities and academic performance. NSRS directly predicted academic outcomes, whereas PSRS only contributed indirectly to academic performance via the interactions with online activities. These results point to concrete avenues to promote self-regulation among students in this type of learning contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2883851.2883883

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2016
Pages
422-429
OpenAlex
W2339576246
Cited by
46
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP150104163)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
student self-regulation, academic performance, online learning activities, first-year engineering students, learning analytics, metacognition, motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review