Cited by 31Online Learning and AnalyticsBig Data and Business IntelligenceEducational Innovations and Challenges

The learning analytics readiness instrument

Oster, Meghan, Lonn, Steven, Pistilli, Matthew D., Brown, Michael G.·2016·Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16

Abstract

Little is known about the processes institutions use when discerning their readiness to implement learning analytics. This study aims to address this gap in the literature by using survey data from the beta version of the Learning Analytics Readiness Instrument (LARI) [1]. Twenty-four institutions were surveyed and 560 respondents participated. Five distinct factors were identified from a factor analysis of the results: Culture; Data Management Expertise; Data Analysis Expertise; Communication and Policy Application; and, Training. Data were analyzed using both the role of those completing the survey and the Carnegie classification of the institutions as lenses. Generally, information technology professionals and institutions classified as Research Universities--Very High research activity had significantly different scores on the identified factors. Working within a framework of organizational learning, this paper details the concept of readiness as a reflective process, as well as how the implementation and application of analytics should be done so with ethical considerations in mind. Limitations of the study, as well as next steps for research in this area, are also discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2883851.2883925

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Learning process for learning analytics contains five main components: ability, data, culture and process, governance and infrastructure, and overall readiness perception.

    “Also, the Learning process [80,81], for LA contains five main components: (1) ability, (2) data, (3) culture and process, (4) governance and infrastructure, and (5) overall readiness perception.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oster, M., Lonn, S., Pistilli, M. D., & Brown, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge - LAK '16
Publisher
ACM Press
Published
2016
Pages
173-182
OpenAlex
W2336119220
Cited by
31
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.93
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Innovations and Challenges
Keywords
learning analytics, institutional readiness, higher education institutions, organizational culture, employee training, Carnegie classification, research universities, organizational learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review