The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobility in collaboration
Abstract
This paper addresses an issue that has received little attention within CSCW- the requirements to support mobility within collaboration activities. By examining three quite different settings each with differing technological support, we examine the ways in which mobility is critical to collaborative work. We suggest that taking mobility seriously, may not only contribute our understanding of current support for collaboration, but raise more general issues concerning the requirements for mobile and other technologies. Keywords mobile communications, augmented reality, object-centred interaction
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Computer for the 21st Century
Weiser, M. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0991-94 · Cited by 10,017
Cited by
Using Affinity Diagrams to Evaluate Interactive Prototypes
Lucero, A. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_19 · Cited by 376
Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype
Suchman, L., Trigg, R., & Blomberg, J. (2002) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00071310220133287 · Cited by 250
Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century
Schmidt, K., & Bannon, L. (2013) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-013-9193-7 · Cited by 129
Sandkuhl, K., Fill, H.-G., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Krogstie, J., Matthes, F., Opdahl, A., Schwabe, G., Uludag, Ö., & Winter, R. (2018) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-017-0516-y · Cited by 111
Mobile technologies in mobile spaces: Findings from the context of train travel
Axtell, C., Hislop, D., & Whittaker, S. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.001 · Cited by 80
Supporting Collaboration Ubiquitously: An augmented learning environment for architecture students
Iacucci, G., & Wagner, I. (2003) · ECSCW 2003 · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0068-0_8 · Cited by 27
Hulikal Muralidhar, S., Bossen, C., Mehra, A., & O'Neill, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3274341 · Cited by 20
Beyond Presentation: Shared Slideware Control as a Resource for Collocated Collaboration
Chattopadhyay, D., Salvadori, F., O’Hara, K., & Rintel, S. (2018) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1388170 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Luff, P., & Heath, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1998-11
- Pages
- 305-314
- OpenAlex
- W2140706899
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
